Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37904153›Full record

SynthesisBMC medical education2023

Effects of simulation in improving the self-confidence of student nurses in clinical practice: a systematic review.

Nojoud Alrashidi, Eddieson Pasay An, Maha Sanat Alrashedi, Aidah Sanad Alqarni, Ferdinand Gonzales, Enas Mohammed Bassuni, Petelyne Pangket, Lorraine Estadilla, Lizy Sonia Benjamin, Kawther Elthayeb Ahmed

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in BMC medical education, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 52 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
52citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

52 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Nojoud AlrashidiCollege of Nursing, University of Hail, Hail City, Saudi Arabia. Nojood202223@gmail.com.
Eddieson Pasay AnCollege of Nursing, King Khalid University, Abha, Saudi Arabia.
Maha Sanat AlrashediCollege of Nursing, University of Hail, Hail City, Saudi Arabia.
Aidah Sanad AlqarniCollege of Nursing, King Khalid University, Abha, Saudi Arabia.
Ferdinand GonzalesCollege of Nursing, King Khalid University, Abha, Saudi Arabia.
Enas Mohammed BassuniCollege of Nursing, King Khalid University, Abha, Saudi Arabia.
Petelyne PangketCollege of Nursing, University of Hail, Hail City, Saudi Arabia.
Lorraine EstadillaCollege of Nursing, King Khalid University, Abha, Saudi Arabia.
Lizy Sonia BenjaminCollege of Nursing, King Khalid University, Abha, Saudi Arabia.
Kawther Elthayeb AhmedCollege of Nursing, King Khalid University, Abha, Saudi Arabia.

Funding

Deanship of Scientific Research at King Khalid University RGP1/406/44.
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundConsidering the positive influence of simulation from previous literature may encourage educators to regard it as a valuable teaching strategy in nursing schools. This literature review aims to investigate whether the use of simulation improves undergraduate nurses' self-confidence during clinical practice. METHODOLOGY: This study employed a literature-based design. Five academic databases, including CINAHL, EBSCO, ProQuest, PubMed and Medline, were utilised to extract relevant studies using appropriate keywords and Boolean operators. Studies published in the last 15 years (2005-2020) were included in the search. Studies were retrieved using the Exclusion and Inclusion criteria. The Critical Appraisal Skills Programme (CASP) was used to critically appraise the studies.

resultsA total of 15 primary research studies were extracted for review. Four major themes emerged from the review: Improved self-confidence to carry out clinical tasks, Increased ability to work in teams, Improved self-confidence to perform community work and Improved self-confidence in communicating with patients and team members.

conclusionClinical simulation is a useful tool in increasing the self-confidence of nursing students to perform clinical tasks, make clinical judgements, communicate with patients and team members and improve their teamwork. To improve the quality of care received by patients, it is recommended that clinical simulations be integrated into the nursing curriculum in Saudi Arabia. Increasing the confidence of students has been shown to be associated with greater confidence in performing clinical tasks.

Indexed as

Students, NursingCurriculumHumansMental ProcessesSaudi ArabiaClinical practiceSelf-confidenceSimulationStudent nurses

Identifiers

PMID37904153
PMCPMC10614341

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.