Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37904117›Full record

SynthesisBMC health services research2023

The current and future costs of colorectal cancer attributable to red and processed meat consumption in Brazil.

Leandro F M Rezende, Thainá Alves Malhão, Rafael da Silva Barbosa, Arthur Orlando Correa Schilithz, Ronaldo Corrêa Ferreira da Silva, Luciana Grucci Maya Moreira, Gerson Ferrari, Paula Aballo Nunes Machado, Maria Eduarda Leão Diogenes

Abstract readMeta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Synthesis in BMC health services research, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Leandro F M RezendeDepartment of Preventive Medicine, Escola Paulista de Medicina, Universidade Federal de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3332-7571
Thainá Alves MalhãoInstituto Nacional de Câncer, Coordenação de Prevenção e Vigilância, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5644-1089
Rafael da Silva BarbosaUniversidade Federal do Espírito Santo, Programa de Pós-Graduação em Política Social, Vitória, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9253-1487
Arthur Orlando Correa SchilithzInstituto Nacional de Câncer, Coordenação de Prevenção e Vigilância, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2457-3965
Ronaldo Corrêa Ferreira da SilvaInstituto Nacional de Câncer, Coordenação de Prevenção e Vigilância, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1017-2426
Luciana Grucci Maya MoreiraInstituto Nacional de Câncer, Coordenação de Prevenção e Vigilância, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1454-1732
Gerson FerrariUniversidad de Santiago de Chile, Escuela de Ciencias de La Actividad Física, El Deport y La Salud, Santiago, Chile.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3177-6576
Paula Aballo Nunes MachadoInstituto Nacional de Câncer, Coordenação de Prevenção e Vigilância, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1693-5962
Maria Eduarda Leão DiogenesInstituto Nacional de Câncer, Coordenação de Prevenção e Vigilância, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil. maria.melo@inca.gov.br.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4134-5860

Funding

Climate and Land Use Alliance G-2007-56990
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCompelling evidence supports the association between red and processed meat consumption and increased risk of colorectal cancer. Herein, we estimated the current (2018) and future (2030) federal direct healthcare costs of colorectal cancer in the Brazilian Unified Health System attributable to red and processed meat consumption. Considering reduced red and processed meat consumption, we also projected attributable costs of colorectal cancer in 2040.

methodsWe retrieved information on red and processed meat consumption from two nationally representative dietary surveys, the Household Budget Survey 2008-2009 and 2017-2018; relative risks for colorectal cancer from a meta-analysis; direct healthcare costs of inpatient and outpatient procedures in adults ≥ 30 years with colorectal cancer (C18-C20) from 2008-2019 by sex.

resultsAttributable costs of colorectal cancer were calculated via comparative risk assessment, assuming a 10-year lag. In 2018, US$ 20.6 million (8.4%) of direct healthcare costs of colorectal cancer were attributable to red and processed meat consumption. In 2030, attributable costs will increase to US$ 86.6 million (19.3%). Counterfactual scenarios of reducing red and processed meat consumption in 2030 suggested that US$ 2.2 to 11.9 million and US$ 13 to 74 million could be saved in 2040, respectively.

conclusionRed and processed meat consumption has an escalating economic impact on the Brazilian Unified Health System. Our findings support interventions and policies focused on primary prevention and cancer.

Indexed as

Colorectal NeoplasmsAdultBrazilDietHumansMeatRisk AssessmentRisk FactorsCancerCost of cancerCost-of-illnessMeatProcessed meatRed meat

Identifiers

PMID37904117
PMCPMC10617206

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.