Observational studyClinical and experimental medicine2023
Systemic immunity markers are associated with clinical outcomes of atezolizumab treatment in patients with triple-negative advanced breast cancer: a retrospective multicenter observational study.
Observational study in Clinical and experimental medicine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
- Pretreatment neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio is associated with immunotherapy efficacy in patients with advanced cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Scientific reports · 2025Pooled it
- Article
- A Review of the Prognostic Significance of Neutrophil-to-Lymphocyte Ratio in Nonhematologic Malignancies.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Review
- Baseline Neutrophil-to-Lymphocyte Ratio Predicts Overall Survival in PD-L1-positive Advanced Triple-negative Breast Cancer With Immune-checkpoint-inhibitor Treatment.Cancer diagnosis & prognosisArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors at 10 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) are reportedly efficacious against triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) and are now recommended as first-line therapy. Systemic immunity markers, the absolute lymphocyte count (ALC) and the neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), have been identified as predict ICI efficacy in patients with various cancers. We retrospectively enrolled 36 TNBC patients who received atezolizumab treatment between September 2019 and May 2021 at eight Japanese medical institutions. We evaluated systemic immunity markers, including dynamic changes in these markers, as predictors of survival benefit derived from atezolizumab treatment. Median time-to-treatment failure (TTF) and overall survival (OS) were 116 days and "not reached", respectively. Patients with low NLR at baseline and decreased NLR at the start of the second cycle (SO2nd) had significantly longer OS than those with high NLR at baseline and increased NLR (SO2nd) (log-rank P < 0.001 and log-rank P = 0.049, respectively). Multivariate analyses identified high ALC at baseline and decreased NLR (SO2nd) as independent predictive markers for longer TTF (P = 0.043 and P = 0.002, respectively), and low NLR at baseline and decreased NLR (SO2nd) as independent predictive markers for longer OS (P < 0.001 and P = 0.013, respectively). The safety profile was consistent with those of previous trials. This retrospective multicenter observational study showed the clinical efficacy and safety of atezolizumab treatment. Furthermore, systemic immunity markers, including their dynamic changes, were found to be associated with clinical outcomes of atezolizumab treatment in patients with advanced or metastatic TNBC.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.