Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37903920›Full record

SynthesisCommunications biology2023

Meta-analysis identifies native priority as a mechanism that supports the restoration of invasion-resistant plant communities.

Melinda Halassy, Péter Batáry, Anikó Csecserits, Katalin Török, Orsolya Valkó

Abstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Communications biology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Melinda HalassyNational Laboratory for Health Security, Centre for Ecological Research, Budapest, Hungary. halassy.melinda@ecolres.hu.ORCID 0000-0001-8523-3169
Péter BatáryNational Laboratory for Health Security, Centre for Ecological Research, Budapest, Hungary.ORCID 0000-0002-1017-6996
Anikó CsecseritsNational Laboratory for Health Security, Centre for Ecological Research, Budapest, Hungary.
Katalin TörökInstitute of Ecology and Botany, Centre for Ecological Research, Vácrátót, Hungary.ORCID 0000-0002-5910-7027
Orsolya ValkóNational Laboratory for Health Security, Centre for Ecological Research, Budapest, Hungary.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The restoration of invasion-resistant plant communities is an important strategy to combat the negative impacts of alien invasions. Based on a systematic review and meta-analysis of seed-based ecological restoration experiments, here we demonstrate the potential of functional similarity, seeding density and priority effect in increasing invasion resistance. Our results indicate that native priority is the most promising mechanism to control invasion that can reduce the performance of invasive alien species by more than 50%. High-density seeding is effective in controlling invasive species, but threshold seeding rates may exist. Overall seeding functionally similar species do not have a significant effect. Generally, the impacts are more pronounced on perennial and grassy invaders and on the short-term. Our results suggest that biotic resistance can be best enhanced by the early introduction of native plant species during restoration. Seeding of a single species with high functional similarity to invasive alien species is unpromising, and instead, preference should be given to high-density multifunctional seed mixtures, possibly including native species favored by the priority effect. We highlight the need to integrate research across geographical regions, global invasive species and potential resistance mechanisms.

Indexed as

Introduced SpeciesPlantsSeeds

Identifiers

PMID37903920
PMCPMC10616274

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.