Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37903909›Full record

Trial reportBritish journal of cancer2024

Efficacy of GV1001 with gemcitabine/capecitabine in previously untreated patients with advanced pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma having high serum eotaxin levels (KG4/2015): an open-label, randomised, Phase 3 trial.

Jung Hyun Jo, Yong-Tae Kim, Ho Soon Choi, Ho Gak Kim, Hong Sik Lee, Young Woo Choi, Dong Uk Kim, Kwang Hyuck Lee, Eui Joo Kim, Joung-Ho Han and 10 more

Erratum issued Registry-linked trialOpen access · hybridAbstract readRandomized Controlled TrialClinical Trial, Phase III
In one paragraph

Trial report in British journal of cancer, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. It is linked to trial NCT02854072 (A Prospective, Randomized, Open-label, Multicenter, Parallel Design, Phase III Study to Assess the Efficacy and Safety of GV1001 Concurrent With Gemcitabine/Capecitabine Versus Gemcitabine/Capecitabine Alone in Treating Locally Advanced and Metastatic Pancreatic Cancer Patients), which is not on this map. Cited by 22 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed
5.1field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02854072 phase3unknown statusnot on this map

A Prospective, Randomized, Open-label, Multicenter, Parallel Design, Phase III Study to Assess the Efficacy and Safety of GV1001 Concurrent With Gemcitabine/Capecitabine Versus Gemcitabine/Capecitabine Alone in Treating Locally Advanced and Metastatic Pancreatic Cancer Patients

TypeinterventionalSponsorSamsung Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd.Ran2015 to 2018Enrolled148ConditionsPancreatic CancerArmsGV1001, Gemcitabine, Capecitabine
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Personalizing DNA Cancer Vaccines.Journal of personalized medicine · 2025
    Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Cancer vaccines: current status and future directions.Journal of hematology & oncology · 2025
    Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

20 authors at 16 institutions in 2 countries.

Jung Hyun JoDivision of Gastroenterology, Department of Internal Medicine, Severance Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
Yong-Tae KimDepartment of Internal Medicine and Liver Research Institute, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
Ho Soon ChoiDepartment of Internal Medicine, Hanyang University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
Ho Gak KimDepartment of Internal Medicine, Daegu Catholic University School of Medicine, Daegu, Korea.
Hong Sik LeeDepartment of Gastroenterology, Korea University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
Young Woo ChoiDepartment of Internal Medicine, Konyang University College of Medicine, Daejeon, Korea.
Dong Uk KimDivision of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Biomedical Research Institute, Pusan National University Hospital, Busan, Korea.
Kwang Hyuck LeeDepartment of Medicine, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
Eui Joo KimDivision of Gastroenterology, Department of Internal Medicine, Gil Medical Center, Gachon University College of Medicine, Incheon, Korea.
Joung-Ho HanDepartment of Internal Medicine, Chungbuk National University College of Medicine & Chungbuk National University Hospital, Cheongju, South Korea.
Seung Ok LeeDepartment of Internal Medicine, The Research Institute for Medical Science, Jeonbuk National University Medical School, Jeonju, Korea.
Chang-Hwan ParkDepartment of Internal Medicine, Chonnam National University Medical School, Gwangju, Korea.
Eun Kwang ChoiDivision of Gastroenterology, Department of Internal Medicine, Jeju National University College of Medicine, Jeju, Korea.
Jae Woo KimDepartment of Internal Medicine, Yonsei University Wonju College of Medicine, Wonju, Republic of Korea.
Jae Yong ChoDepartment of Internal Medicine, Gangnam Severance Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
Woo Jin LeeCenter for Liver and Pancreatobiliary Cancer, National Cancer Center, Goyang, Korea.
Hyungsik Roger MoonDepartment of Economics, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
Mi-Suk ParkDepartment of Radiology, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Severance Hospital, Seoul, Korea.
Sangjae KimGemVax & KAEL Co., Ltd. 58, Techno 11-ro, Yuseong-gu, Daejeon, Republic of Korea.
Si Young SongDivision of Gastroenterology, Department of Internal Medicine, Severance Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea. sysong@yuhs.ac.ORCID 0000-0002-1417-4314
Yonsei University · KRChonnam National University · KRChungbuk National University Hospital · KRDaegu Catholic University · KRGachon University · KRGemVax & KAEL (South Korea) · KRHanyang University · KRJeju National University · KRJeonbuk National University · KRKonyang University · KRKorea University · KRNational Cancer Center · KRPusan National University Hospital · KRSamsung Medical Center · KRSeoul National University · KRUniversity of Southern California · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe TeloVac study indicated GV1001 did not improve the survival of advanced pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC). However, the cytokine examinations suggested that high serum eotaxin levels may predict responses to GV1001. This Phase III trial assessed the efficacy of GV1001 with gemcitabine/capecitabine for eotaxin-high patients with untreated advanced PDAC.

methodsPatients recruited from 16 hospitals received gemcitabine (1000 mg/m

resultsTotal 148 patients were randomly assigned to the GV1001 (n = 75) and control groups (n = 73). The GV1001 group showed improved median OS (11.3 vs. 7.5 months, P = 0.021) and TTP (7.3 vs. 4.5 months, P = 0.021) compared to the control group. Grade >3 adverse events were reported in 77.3% and 73.1% in the GV1001 and control groups (P = 0.562), respectively.

conclusionsGV1001 plus gemcitabine/capecitabine improved OS and TTP compared to gemcitabine/capecitabine alone in eotaxin-high patients with advanced PDAC. CLINICAL

trial registrationNCT02854072.

Indexed as

AdenocarcinomaPancreatic NeoplasmsAntineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsCapecitabineDeoxycytidineGemcitabineHumansCapecitabineDeoxycytidineGemcitabine

Identifiers

PMID37903909
PMCPMC10781743
OpenAlexW4388021773

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.