Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37903906›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2023

A dose-response characterization of transcranial magnetic stimulation intensity and evoked potential amplitude in the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex.

Louisa Krile, Elnaz Ensafi, Jaeden Cole, Mah Noor, Andrea B Protzner, Alexander McGirr

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Temporal Interference Stimulation Enhances Neural Regeneration.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Louisa KrileDepartment of Psychology, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada.
Elnaz EnsafiDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Calgary, 3280 Hospital Drive NW, TRW-4D68, Calgary, AB, T2N 4Z6, Canada.
Jaeden ColeDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Calgary, 3280 Hospital Drive NW, TRW-4D68, Calgary, AB, T2N 4Z6, Canada.
Mah NoorDepartment of Psychology, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada.
Andrea B ProtznerDepartment of Psychology, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada.
Alexander McGirrDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Calgary, 3280 Hospital Drive NW, TRW-4D68, Calgary, AB, T2N 4Z6, Canada. alexander.mcgirr@ucalgary.ca.
Centre for Addiction and Mental Health · CAUniversity of Calgary · CA

Funding

CIHR
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

By combining transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) with electroencephalography, human cortical circuits can be directly interrogated. The resulting electrical trace contains TMS-evoked potential (TEP) components, and it is not known whether the amplitudes of these components are stimulus intensity dependent. We examined this in the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex in nineteen healthy adult participants and extracted TEP amplitudes for the N40, P60, N120, and P200 components at 110%, 120%, and 130% of resting motor threshold (RMT). To probe plasticity of putative stimulus intensity dose-response relationships, this was repeated after participants received intermittent theta burst stimulation (iTBS; 600 pulses, 80% RMT). The amplitude of the N120 and P200 components exhibited a stimulus intensity dose-response relationship, however the N40 and P60 components did not. After iTBS, the N40 and P60 components continued to exhibit a lack of stimulus intensity dose-dependency, and the P200 dose-response was unchanged. In the N120 component, however, we saw evidence of change within the stimulus intensity dose-dependent relationship characterized by a decrease in absolute peak amplitudes at lower stimulus intensities. These data suggest that TEP components have heterogeneous dose-response relationships, with implications for standardizing and harmonizing methods across experiments. Moreover, the selective modification of the N120 dose-response relationship may provide a novel marker for iTBS plasticity in health and disease.

Indexed as

Dorsolateral Prefrontal CortexTranscranial Magnetic StimulationAdultElectroencephalographyEvoked PotentialsEvoked Potentials, MotorHealthy VolunteersHumansPrefrontal Cortex

Identifiers

PMID37903906
PMCPMC10616119
OpenAlexW4388016818

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.