ArticleSurgical endoscopy2023
Machine learning approaches in the interpretation of endobronchial ultrasound images: a comparative analysis.
Article in Surgical endoscopy, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed.
- Recent advances in artificial intelligence across interventional pulmonology: a narrative review.Journal of thoracic disease · 2026Review
- Review
- Explainability of a Deep Learning Model for Mediastinal Lymph Node Station Classification in Endobronchial Ultrasound (EBUS).Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Review
- A New Deep Learning-Based Method for Automated Identification of Thoracic Lymph Node Stations in Endobronchial Ultrasound (EBUS): A Proof-of-Concept Study.Journal of imaging · 2025Article
- Deep learning-based prediction of nodal metastasis in lung cancer using endobronchial ultrasound.JTCVS techniques · 2024Article
- Automatic Segmentation of Mediastinal Lymph Nodes and Blood Vessels in Endobronchial Ultrasound (EBUS) Images Using Deep Learning.Journal of imaging · 2024Article
- Artificial Intelligence in Interventional Pulmonology.Therapeutic advances in pulmonary and critical care medicineReview
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThis study explores the application of machine learning (ML) in analyzing endobronchial ultrasound (EBUS) images for the detection of lymph node (LN) malignancy, aiming to augment diagnostic accuracy and efficiency. We investigated whether ML could outperform conventional classification systems in identifying malignant involvement of LNs, based on eight established sonographic features.
methodsRetrospective data from two tertiary care hospital bronchoscopy units were utilized, encompassing healthcare reports of patients who had undergone EBUS between January 2017 and March 2023. The ML model was trained and tested using MATLAB, with 80% of the data allocated for training/validation, and 20% for testing. Performance was evaluated based on validation and testing accuracy, and receiver operating characteristic curves with comparing trained models and existing classification rules.
resultsThe study analyzed 992 LNs, with 42.3% malignancy prevalence. Malignant LNs showed characteristic features such as larger size and distinct margins. The fine tuned models achieved testing accuracies of 95.9% and 96.4% for fine Gaussian SVM and KNN, respectively. Corresponding AUROC's were 0.955 and 0.963, outperforming other similar studies and conventional analyses.
conclusionFine tuned ML applications like SVM and KNN, can significantly enhance the analysis of EBUS images, improving diagnostic accuracy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
37903885What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.