ArticleScientific reports2023
Predicting the strengths of date fiber reinforced concrete subjected to elevated temperature using artificial neural network, and Weibull distribution.
Article in Scientific reports, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.
- Effect of high shear-dispersed nano-alumina on concrete strength, durability, and microstructure.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Multi-criteria decision-based optimization and multivariable regression analysis of date palm fiber reinforced concrete modified with silica fume under normal and elevated temperatures.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Compressive strength of nano concrete materials under elevated temperatures using machine learning.Scientific reports · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 4 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Date palm fiber (DPF) is normally used as fiber material in concrete. Though its addition to concrete leads to decline in durability and mechanical strengths performance. Additionally, due to its high ligno-cellulose content and organic nature, when used in concrete for high temperature application, the DPF can easily degrade causing reduction in strength and increase in weight loss. To reduce these effects, the DPF is treated using alkaline solutions. Furthermore, pozzolanic materials are normally added to the DPF composites to reduce the effects of the ligno-cellulose content. Therefore, in this study silica fume was used as supplementary cementitious material in DPF reinforced concrete (DPFRC) to reduce the negative effects of elevated temperature. Hence this study aimed at predicting the residual strengths of DPFRC enhanced/improved with silica fume subjected to elevated temperature using different models such as artificial neural network (ANN), multi-variable regression analysis (MRA) and Weibull distribution. The DPFRC is produced by adding DPF in proportions of 0%, 1%, 2% and 3% by mass. Silica fume was used as partial substitute to cement in dosages of 0%, 5%, 10% and 15% by volume. The DPFRC was then subjected to elevated temperatures between 200 and 800 °C. The weight loss, residual compressive strength and relative strengths were measured. The residual compressive strength and relative strength of the DPFRC declined with addition of DPF at any temperature. Silica fume enhanced the residual and relative strengths of the DPFRC when heated to a temperature up to 400 °C. To forecast residual compressive strength (RCS) and relative strength (RS), we provide two distinct ANN models. The first layer's inputs include DPF (%), silica fume (%), temperature (°C), and weight loss (%). The hidden layer is thought to have ten neurons. M-I is the scenario in which we use RCS as an output, whereas M-II is the scenario in which we use RS as an output. The ANN models were trained using the Levenberg-Marquardt backpropagation algorithm (LMBA). Both neural networking models exhibit a significant correlation between the predicted and actual values, as seen by their respective R = 0.99462 and R = 0.98917. The constructed neural models M-I and M-II are highly accurate at predicting RCS and RS values. MRA and Weibull distribution were used for prediction of the strengths of the DPFRC under high temperature. The developed MRA was found to have a good prediction accuracy. The residual compressive strength and relative strength followed the two-parameter Weibull distribution.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.