Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37903755›Full record

ArticleNature communications2023

Phylogenetic evidence reveals early Kra-Dai divergence and dispersal in the late Holocene.

Yuxin Tao, Yuancheng Wei, Jiaqi Ge, Yan Pan, Wenmin Wang, Qianqi Bi, Pengfei Sheng, Changzhong Fu, Wuyun Pan, Li Jin and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature communications, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Yuxin Tao *State Key Laboratory of Genetic Engineering, Center for Evolutionary Biology, Human Phenome Institute, Zhangjiang Fudan International Innovation Center, School of Life Science, Fudan University, Shanghai, 200438, China.
Yuancheng Wei *School of Chinese Language and Literature, Guangxi Minzu University, Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region, Nanning, China.
Jiaqi Ge *Department of Chinese Language and Literature, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
Yan Pan *Department of Cultural Heritage and Museology, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
Wenmin WangCollege of Nationalities, Guangdong Polytechnic Normal University, Guangzhou, China.
Qianqi BiCollege of Communication, East China University of Political Science and Law, Shanghai, China.
Pengfei ShengInstitute of Archaeological Science, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
Changzhong FuCollege of Nationalities, Guangdong Polytechnic Normal University, Guangzhou, China.
Wuyun PanInstitute of Modern Languages and Linguistics, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
Li JinState Key Laboratory of Genetic Engineering, Center for Evolutionary Biology, Human Phenome Institute, Zhangjiang Fudan International Innovation Center, School of Life Science, Fudan University, Shanghai, 200438, China.ORCID 0000-0001-9201-2321
Hong-Xiang ZhengMinistry of Education Key Laboratory of Contemporary Anthropology, Department of Anthropology and Human Genetics, School of Life Sciences, Fudan University, Shanghai, China. zhenghongxiang@fudan.edu.cn.ORCID 0000-0003-1637-0375
Menghan ZhangInstitute of Modern Languages and Linguistics, Fudan University, Shanghai, China. mhzhang@fudan.edu.cn.ORCID 0000-0002-3505-862X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Studying language evolution brings a crucial perspective to bear on questions of human prehistory. As the most linguistically diverse region on earth, East and Southeast Asia have witnessed extensive sociocultural and ethnic contacts among different language communities. Especially, the Kra-Dai language family exhibits tremendous socio-cultural importance in these regions. Due to limited historical accounts, however, there are several controversies on their linguistic relatedness, ambiguities regarding the divergence time, and uncertainties on the dispersal patterns. To address these issues, here we apply Bayesian phylogenetic methods to analyze the largest lexical dataset containing 646 cognate sets compiled for 100 Kra-Dai languages. Our dated phylogenetic tree showed their initial divergence occurring approximately 4000 years BP. Phylogeographic results supported the early Kra-Dai language dispersal from the Guangxi-Guangdong area of South China towards Mainland Southeast Asia. Coupled with genetic, archaeological, paleoecologic, and paleoclimatic data, we demonstrated that the Kra-Dai language diversification could have coincided with their demic diffusion and agricultural spread shaped by the global climate change in the late Holocene. The interdisciplinary alignments shed light on reconstructing the prehistory of Kra-Dai languages and provide an indispensable piece of the puzzle for further studying prehistoric human activities in East and Southeast Asia.

Indexed as

LanguageBayes TheoremChinaHumansPhylogenyPhylogeography

Identifiers

PMID37903755
PMCPMC10616200

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.