Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37903561›Full record

ArticleJournal of neurointerventional surgery2024

Re-rupture in ruptured brain arteriovenous malformations: a retrospective cohort study based on a nationwide multicenter prospective registry.

Kexin Yuan, Yu Chen, Debin Yan, Ruinan Li, Zhipeng Li, Haibin Zhang, Ke Wang, Heze Han, Yahui Zhao, Li Ma and 13 more

Open access · hybridAbstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of neurointerventional surgery, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
2.9field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Ultrafast rebleeding pediatric brain arteriovenous malformation: a case report.Child's nervous system : ChNS : official journal of the International Society for Pediatric Neurosurgery · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

23 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Kexin Yuan *Department of Neurosurgery, Beijing Tiantan Hospital, Beijing, China.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0937-2711
Yu Chen *Department of Neurosurgery, Beijing Tiantan Hospital, Beijing, China.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2491-3974
Debin YanDepartment of Neurosurgery, Beijing Tiantan Hospital, Beijing, China.
Ruinan LiDepartment of Neurosurgery, Beijing Tiantan Hospital, Beijing, China.
Zhipeng LiDepartment of Neurosurgery, Beijing Tiantan Hospital, Beijing, China.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9122-092X
Haibin ZhangDepartment of Neurosurgery, Beijing Tiantan Hospital, Beijing, China.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0366-4040
Ke WangDepartment of Neurosurgery, Beijing Tiantan Hospital, Beijing, China.
Heze HanDepartment of Neurosurgery, Beijing Tiantan Hospital, Beijing, China.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9155-038X
Yahui ZhaoDepartment of Neurosurgery, Beijing Tiantan Hospital, Beijing, China.
Li MaDepartment of Neurosurgery, Beijing Tiantan Hospital, Beijing, China.
Qiang HaoDepartment of Neurosurgery, Beijing Tiantan Hospital, Beijing, China.
Xun YeDepartment of Neurosurgery, Beijing Tiantan Hospital, Beijing, China.
Hengwei JinDepartment of Interventional Neuroradiology, Beijing Tiantan Hospital, Beijing, China.
Xiangyu MengBeijing Neurosurgical Institute, Beijing, China.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7703-1177
Ali LiuDepartment of Gamma-Knife center, Beijing Tiantan Hospital, Beijing, China.
Dezhi GaoDepartment of Gamma-Knife center, Beijing Tiantan Hospital, Beijing, China.
Shibin SunDepartment of Gamma-Knife center, Beijing Tiantan Hospital, Beijing, China.
Shuai KangDepartment of Neurosurgery, Beijing Tiantan Hospital, Beijing, China.
Hao WangDepartment of Neurosurgery, Beijing Tiantan Hospital, Beijing, China.
Youxiang LiDepartment of Interventional Neuroradiology, Capital Medical University, Beijing, Fengtai District, China.
Shuo WangDepartment of Neurosurgery, Beijing Tiantan Hospital, Beijing, China.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4919-5390
Xiaolin ChenDepartment of Neurosurgery, Beijing Tiantan Hospital, Beijing, China zhaoyuanli@126.com cxl_bjtth@163.com.
Yuanli ZhaoDepartment of Neurosurgery, Beijing Tiantan Hospital, Beijing, China zhaoyuanli@126.com cxl_bjtth@163.com.
Beijing Tian Tan Hospital · CNCapital Medical University · CNUniversity of California, San Francisco · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThis study aimed to investigate the natural history of re-rupture in ruptured brain arteriovenous malformations (AVMs) and to provide comprehensive insights into its associated factors and prevention.

methodsThis study included 1712 eligible ruptured AVMs from a nationwide multicenter prospective collaboration registry between August 2011 and September 2021. The natural rupture risk before intervention and the annual rupture risk after intervention were both assessed. Cox proportional hazard regression models and Kaplan-Meier survival curves were used to explore independent factors associated with AVM re-rupture. The correlation between these factors and AVM re-rupture was verified in multiple independent cohorts, and the prevention effect of intervention timing and intervention strategies on AVM re-rupture was further analyzed.

resultsThe annual re-rupture risk in ruptured AVMs was 7.6%, and the cumulative re-rupture risk in the first 1, 3, 5, and 10 years following the initial rupture were 10%, 25%, 37.5%, and 50%, respectively. Cox proportional hazard regression analysis confirmed adult patients, ventricular system involvement, and any deep venous drainage as independent factors associated with AVM re-rupture. The intervention was found to significantly reduce the risk of AVM re-rupture (annual rupture risk 11.34% vs 1.70%, p<0.001), especially in those who underwent surgical resection (annual rupture risk 0.13%).

conclusionsThe risk of re-rupture in ruptured AVMs is high. Adult patients, ventricular system involvement, and any deep venous drainage are independent risk factors for re-rupture. Applying the results universally to all ruptured AVM cases may be biased. Intervention could effectively reduce the risk of re-rupture.

Indexed as

Intracranial Arteriovenous MalformationsRegistriesAdolescentAdultChildCohort StudiesFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedProspective StudiesRecurrenceRetrospective StudiesRisk FactorsRupture, SpontaneousYoung Adultarteriovenous malformation

Identifiers

PMID37903561
PMCPMC11503091
OpenAlexW4388035302

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.