Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37903507›Full record

ArticleJournal of chemical information and modeling2023

Conformer Generation for Structure-Based Drug Design: How Many and How Good?

Andrew T McNutt, Fatimah Bisiriyu, Sophia Song, Ananya Vyas, Geoffrey R Hutchison, David Ryan Koes

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of chemical information and modeling, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. TEMPL: A Template-Based Protein-Ligand Pose Prediction Baseline.Journal of chemical information and modeling · 2025
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. The physics-AI dialogue in drug design.RSC medicinal chemistry · 2025
    Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Andrew T McNuttDepartment of Computational and Systems Biology, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15213, United States.
Fatimah BisiriyuThe Neighborhood Academy, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15206, United States.
Sophia SongUpper St. Clair High School, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15241, United States.
Ananya VyasTaylor Allderdice High School, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15217, United States.
Geoffrey R HutchisonDepartment of Chemistry, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15213, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-1757-1980
David Ryan KoesDepartment of Computational and Systems Biology, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15213, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-6892-6614

Funding

New Methods and Tools for Computational Drug Discovery: Diversity SupplementR35GM140753 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI KOES, DAVID RYAN · 2021 to 2025
$2.2M
NIGMS NIH HHS R35 GM140753
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Conformer generation, the assignment of realistic 3D coordinates to a small molecule, is fundamental to structure-based drug design. Conformational ensembles are required for rigid-body matching algorithms, such as shape-based or pharmacophore approaches, and even methods that treat the ligand flexibly, such as docking, are dependent on the quality of the provided conformations due to not sampling all degrees of freedom (e.g., only sampling torsions). Here, we empirically elucidate some general principles about the size, diversity, and quality of the conformational ensembles needed to get the best performance in common structure-based drug discovery tasks. In many cases, our findings may parallel "common knowledge" well-known to practitioners of the field. Nonetheless, we feel that it is valuable to quantify these conformational effects while reproducing and expanding upon previous studies. Specifically, we investigate the performance of a state-of-the-art generative deep learning approach versus a more classical geometry-based approach, the effect of energy minimization as a postprocessing step, the effect of ensemble size (maximum number of conformers), and construction (filtering by root-mean-square deviation for diversity) and how these choices influence the ability to recapitulate bioactive conformations and perform pharmacophore screening and molecular docking.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsDrug DesignLigandsModels, MolecularMolecular ConformationMolecular Docking SimulationLigands

Identifiers

PMID37903507
PMCPMC10647020

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.