Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37903165›Full record

ArticleMilitary psychology : the official journal of the Division of Military Psychology, American Psychological Association

Resilience in Army STARRS: Evaluating psychometrics of a multi-dimensional resilience measure.

Kayla Reed-Fitzke, Anthony J Ferraro, James M Duncan, Armeda S Wojciak, Alexus Hamilton, Hilary D Pippert

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Military psychology : the official journal of the Division of Military Psychology, American Psychological Association. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 37% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Kayla Reed-FitzkeDepartment of Psychological and Quantitative Foundations, University of Iowa, Iowa City, Iowa.ORCID 0000-0001-5708-0556
Anthony J FerraroDepartment of Applied Human Sciences, Kansas State University, Manhattan, Kansas.
James M DuncanSchool of Human Environmental Sciences, University of Arkansas, Fayetteville.
Armeda S WojciakDepartment of Psychological and Quantitative Foundations, University of Iowa, Iowa City, Iowa.
Alexus HamiltonDepartment of Psychological and Quantitative Foundations, University of Iowa, Iowa City, Iowa.
Hilary D PippertDepartment of Applied Human Sciences, Kansas State University, Manhattan, Kansas.
University of Iowa · USKansas State University · USUniversity of Arkansas at Fayetteville · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

As policymakers and the U.S. military continue to place an emphasis on the resilience of servicemembers, it is critical to utilize psychometrically sound and valid scales to measure resilience. Using two independent samples of Army soldiers-in-training, this study explored the measurement of resilience in the Army Study to Assess Risk and Resilience among Servicemembers (Army STARRS) New Soldier Study Component (NSS). Exploratory factor analysis (EFA) was used to identify the factor structure of a measure of resilience within the Army STARRS NSS. Confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) was then used to confirm the factor structure, then internal reliability was assessed. Convergent validity of the identified resilience factors was examined using two-tailed bivariate correlations. The EFA identified a three-factor structure of a measure of resilience. The CFA confirm the first-order three-factor structure of

Indexed as

Major Depressive DisorderMilitary PersonnelHumansPsychometricsReproducibility of ResultsRisk AssessmentArmyfactor analysismeasurementresiliencevalidity

Identifiers

PMID37903165
PMCPMC10617280
OpenAlexW4307047437

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.