Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37902814›Full record

ArticleJMIR research protocols2023

The Web-Based Pain-at-Work Toolkit With Telephone Support for Employees With Chronic or Persistent Pain: Protocol for a Cluster Randomized Feasibility Trial.

Holly Blake, Wendy J Chaplin, Elaine Wainwright, Gordon Taylor, Paul McNamee, Daniel McWilliams, Victoria Abbott-Fleming, Jain Holmes, Aaron Fecowycz, David Andrew Walsh and 1 more

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR research protocols, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05838677 (Multicentre Pragmatic Cluster Randomised Controlled Feasibility Trial to Assess Potential Effectiveness and Cost-effectiveness of the Pain at Work Toolkit in Employees With Chronic or Persistent Pain), which is not on this map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05838677 nacompletednot on this map

Multicentre Pragmatic Cluster Randomised Controlled Feasibility Trial to Assess Potential Effectiveness and Cost-effectiveness of the Pain at Work Toolkit in Employees With Chronic or Persistent Pain

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of NottinghamRan2023 to 2025Enrolled380ConditionsChronic Pain, Pain, ChronicArmsPain at Work Toolkit, Active control
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Holly BlakeSchool of Health Sciences, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3080-2306
Wendy J ChaplinSchool of Health Sciences, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2024-9685
Elaine WainwrightAberdeen Centre for Arthritis and Musculoskeletal Health (Epidemiology Group), School of Medicine, Medical Sciences and Nutrition, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5678-4412
Gordon TaylorCollege of Medicine and Health, University of Exeter, Exeter, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1715-0913
Paul McNameeHealth Economics Research Unit, Institute of Applied Health Sciences, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4540-8718
Daniel McWilliamsPain Centre Versus Arthritis, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0581-1895
Victoria Abbott-FlemingThe Patient Voices Committee, British Pain Society, London, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0004-3953-8040
Jain HolmesAcademic Unit of Injury, Recovery and Inflammation Sciences, School of Medicine, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2465-102X
Aaron FecowyczSchool of Health Sciences, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0007-6899-3693
David Andrew WalshPain Centre Versus Arthritis, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6316-5692
Karen Walker-BoneSchool of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Australia, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5992-1459

Funding

Medical Research Council MC_PC_19095
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundChronic or persistent pain affects one's ability to work or be productive at work, generating high societal and economic burden. However, the provision of work-related advice and support for people with chronic pain is variable or lacking. The Pain-at-Work (PAW) Toolkit was cocreated with people who live with pain, health care professionals, and employers. It aims to increase knowledge about employee rights and how to access support for managing a painful chronic condition in the workplace and provides advice on lifestyle behaviors that facilitate the management of chronic pain.

objectiveWe aimed to establish the feasibility of conducting a definitive cluster randomized controlled trial comparing access to the PAW Toolkit and telephone support calls from an occupational therapist (PAW) with treatment as usual (ie, standard support from their employer). Our primary outcomes are establishing parameters of feasibility, acceptability, usability, and safety of this digital workplace health intervention. We will assess the candidate primary and secondary outcomes' feasibility and test research processes for a definitive trial.

methodsThis is an open-label, parallel 2-arm pragmatic feasibility cluster randomized controlled trial with exploratory health economics analysis and a nested qualitative interview study. We aim to recruit 120 participants from at least 8 workplace clusters (any type, >10 employees) in England. The recruitment of workplaces occurs via personal approach, and the recruitment of individual participants is web based. Eligible participants are vocationally active adults aged ≥18 years with internet access and self-reporting chronic pain interfering with their ability to undertake or enjoy productive work. A restricted 1:1 cluster-level randomization is used to allocate employment settings to PAW or treatment as usual; participants are unblinded to group allocation. Following site- and individual-level consent, participants complete a web-based baseline survey (time 0), including measures of work capacity, health and well-being, and health care resource use. Follow-up is performed at 3 months (time 1) and 6 months (time 2). Feasibility outcomes relate to recruitment; intervention fidelity (eg, delivery, reach, uptake, and engagement); retention; and follow-up. Qualitative evaluation (time 2) is mapped to the Capability, Opportunity, Motivation-Behavior model and will explore intervention acceptability to employees and employers, along with individual and contextual factors influencing the delivery and uptake of the intervention.

resultsEthics approval was obtained in March 2023. Trial recruitment began in June 2023.

conclusionsThe PAW Toolkit is the first evidence-based digital health intervention aimed at supporting the self-management of chronic or persistent pain at work. This study will inform the design of a definitive trial, including sample size estimation, approaches to cluster site identification, primary and secondary outcomes' selection, and the final health economic model. Findings will inform approaches for the future delivery of this digital health intervention.

trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov NCT05838677; https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT05838677. INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPORT IDENTIFIER (IRRID): DERR1-10.2196/51474.

Indexed as

chronic paindisabilityeHealthfeasibilityrandomized controlled trialworkplace

Identifiers

PMID37902814
PMCPMC10644198

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.