ArticleJMIR research protocols2023
Development of the Preferred Components for Co-Design in Research Guideline and Checklist: Protocol for a Scoping Review and a Modified Delphi Process.
Article in JMIR research protocols, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
19 citing papers in PubMed.
- Rethinking obesity management targets: Findings from an international MoSCoW prioritization workshop.Obesity pillars · 2026Article
- Co-Designing Person- and Family-Centered Care for Older Adults Living With HIV: Protocol for a Community-Based Participatory Study.JMIR research protocols · 2026Article
- Co-creation, co-design or co-production? Reflections on the development of urban health systems implementation strategies to improve access and quality of primary healthcare services in Bangladesh, Ghana, Nepal and Nigeria.Health research policy and systems · 2026Article
- Beyond a buzzword: the need for shared language, education, and enhanced reporting of disability inclusive co-design research.Research involvement and engagement · 2026Article
- Participatory Rapid Appraisal and Focus Groups to co-design technology-supported integrated care.PloS one · 2026Article
- Co-design rationales as living documents for reporting the exchange of experiential, professional and scientific perspectives in mental health care innovation.PLOS mental health · 2026Article
- Evaluating co-design processes used in the development of healthcare interventions in residential aged care: a scoping review.Journal of public health (Oxford, England) · 2025Article
- Community co-design of research intervention materials to reduce cervical cancer disparities in Appalachia.PEC innovation · 2025Article
- Supporting Older People Living With Frailty to Self-Manage Multiple Medicines: An Experience-Based Co-Design of a Complex Intervention Developed in UK Primary Care.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2025Article
- Processes Underpinning Successful Co-Design: Lessons From a Digital Health Project.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2025Article
- Engaging patients, family caregivers and healthcare providers to develop metrics tailored to a palliative care population: a content validity process.Journal of patient-reported outcomes · 2025Article
- Multi-Stakeholder Aged Care Research Networks: A Scoping Review.The Gerontologist · 2025Article
- Article
- An umbrella review on how digital health intervention co-design is conducted and described.NPJ digital medicine · 2024Article
- Development of a behaviour change intervention for improving physical activity amongst stroke survivors with physical disabilities: a co-design approach.BMC public health · 2024Article
- Mechanisms for co-designing and co-producing health and social care: a realist synthesis.Research involvement and engagement · 2024Review
- Development of a digital intervention for psychedelic preparation (DIPP).Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Understanding the use of co-design methods for research involving older adults living with HIV: A scoping review protocol.PloS one · 2024Article
- Shining a light on the road towards conducting principle-based co-production research in rehabilitation.Frontiers in rehabilitation sciences · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
34 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThere is increasing evidence that co-design can lead to more engaging, acceptable, relevant, feasible, and even effective interventions. However, no guidance is provided on the specific designs and associated methods or methodologies involved in the process. We propose the development of the Preferred Components for Co-design in Research (PRECISE) guideline to enhance the consistency, transparency, and quality of reporting co-design studies used to develop complex health interventions.
objectiveThe aim is to develop the first iteration of the PRECISE guideline. The purpose of the PRECISE guideline is to improve the consistency, transparency, and quality of reporting on studies that use co-design to develop complex health interventions.
methodsThe aim will be achieved by addressing the following objectives: to review and synthesize the literature on the models, theories, and frameworks used in the co-design of complex health interventions to identify their common elements (components, values or principles, associated methods and methodologies, and outcomes); and by using the results of the scoping review, prioritize the co-design components, values or principles, associated methods and methodologies, and outcomes to be included in the PRECISE guideline.
resultsThe project has been funded by the Canadian Institutes of Health Research.
conclusionsThe collective results of this project will lead to a ready-to-implement PRECISE guideline that outlines a minimum set of items to include when reporting the co-design of complex health interventions. The PRECISE guideline will improve the consistency, transparency, and quality of reports of studies. Additionally, it will include guidance on how to enact or enable the values or principles of co-design for meaningful and collaborative solutions (interventions). PRECISE might also be used by peer reviewers and editors to improve the review of manuscripts involving co-design. Ultimately, the PRECISE guideline will facilitate more efficient use of new results about complex health intervention development and bring better returns on research investments. INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPORT IDENTIFIER (IRRID): PRR1-10.2196/50463.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.