Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37902755›Full record

ArticleJAMA network open2023

Trends in Cardiovascular Disease Mortality in US Women Veterans vs Civilians.

Ramin Ebrahimi, Elizabeth M Yano, Carlos A Alvarez, Paul A Dennis, A Laurie Shroyer, Jean C Beckham, Jennifer A Sumner

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JAMA network open, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
4.2field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Women veterans' outcomes and experiences with STEP-Home transdiagnostic reintegration workshops: Implications for future implementation.Military psychology : the official journal of the Division of Military Psychology, American Psychological Association · 2026
    Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Self-awareness of soldiers regarding risk factors for cardiovascular diseases.International journal of occupational medicine and environmental health · 2025
    Article
  11. Cardiac Rehabilitation Among Veterans: A Narrative Review.Journal of cardiopulmonary rehabilitation and prevention · 2025
    Review
  12. The Heart Matters: Women Veterans, Cardiovascular Disease, and PTSD.Federal practitioner : for the health care professionals of the VA, DoD, and PHS · 2025
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 7 institutions in 1 country.

Ramin EbrahimiDepartment of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles.
Elizabeth M YanoVeterans Affairs Health Services Research & Development Center for the Study of Healthcare Innovation, Implementation and Policy, Veterans Affairs Greater Los Angeles Healthcare System, Los Angeles, California.
Carlos A AlvarezDepartment of Pharmacy Practice, Texas Tech University Health Science Center, Dallas.
Paul A DennisDepartment of Population Health Sciences, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina.
A Laurie ShroyerDepartment of Surgery, Renaissance School of Medicine, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, New York.
Jean C BeckhamDurham Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina.
Jennifer A SumnerDepartment of Psychology, University of California, Los Angeles.
Center for the Study of Healthcare Provider Behavior · USDuke University · USDurham VA Medical Center · USStony Brook School · USUniversity of California, Los Angeles · USVA Greater Los Angeles Healthcare System · USVA North Texas Health Care System · US

Funding

UT Southwestern Center for Translational MedicineUL1TR003163 · NCATS · UT SOUTHWESTERN MEDICAL CENTER · PI TOTO, ROBERT DANIEL · 2021 to 2025
$39.3M
HSRD VA I50 HX002734HSRD VA IK6 HX002836NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR003163
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: Cardiovascular disease (CVD) remains the leading cause of death in the US. Women veterans have higher rates of CVD compared with civilian US women; however, analyses of recent trends in mortality from cardiac disease for women veterans are lacking. Objective: To investigate trends in cardiac disease mortality among women veterans over approximately the past 2 decades and compare rates with those for civilian women. Design, Setting, and Participants: In this retrospective longitudinal cohort study, US Veterans Health Administration (VHA) electronic health record data, linked with the National Death Index, were analyzed for CVD trends and rates of cardiac disease mortality among women veterans (aged 18 years or older) with VHA health care encounters from January 1, 2000, to December 31, 2017. These data were compared with a national cohort of civilian women (aged 15 years or older) in the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Wide-Ranging Online Data for Epidemiologic Research (CDC WONDER) database, which provides cause-of-death data using death certificates for all US residents. The data analysis was performed between March 10, 2021, and November 28, 2022. Exposure: Cardiac disease mortality among women veterans and civilian women. Main Outcomes and Measures: Cardiac disease mortality was based on International Classification of Diseases, Tenth Revision diagnostic codes (I00-I09, I11, I13, and I20-I51 as defined by CDC WONDER). For women veterans and civilian women, crude and age-adjusted cardiac disease mortality rates (per 100 000 life-years) and 95% CIs were calculated, with the 2000 US general population as the reference for age-adjusted rates. Results: From 2000 to 2017, 817 912 women veterans engaged with VHA health care (mean [SD] age, 45.7 [17.1] years), and 19 022 cardiac disease deaths were identified (22.4% of total deaths). The crude and age-adjusted cardiac disease mortality rates, respectively, per 100 000 life-years were 200.2 (95% CI, 181.0-221.0) and 197.6 (95% CI, 175.2-222.0) in 2000 and 196.0 (95% CI, 186.1-206.4) and 208.1 (95% CI, 196.4-220.4) in 2017, reflecting stable crude rates and a 5.3% increase in age-adjusted rates. For civilian women, the crude and age-adjusted rates decreased over time from 320.7 (95% CI, 319.7-321.8) and 268.1 (95% CI, 267.3-269.0) in 2000 to 220.9 (95% CI, 220.1-221.7) and 164.7 (95% CI, 164.1-165.3) in 2017. Conclusions and Relevance: In this cohort study comparing women veterans and civilian women, cardiac disease mortality rates for women veterans did not exhibit the improvements seen for civilian women during the nearly 2-decade study period. Further research and actionable clinical interventions are warranted to improve cardiovascular care for women veterans, who represent the fastest growing group of patients within the VHA health care system.

Indexed as

Cardiovascular DiseasesHeart DiseasesVeteransCohort StudiesFemaleHumansLongitudinal StudiesMiddle AgedRetrospective StudiesUnited States

Identifiers

PMID37902755
PMCPMC10616720
OpenAlexW4388035387

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.