Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37902527›Full record

SynthesisAge and ageing2023

Measurement properties of instruments to measure the fatigue domain of vitality capacity in community-dwelling older people: an umbrella review of systematic reviews and meta-analysis.

Veerle Knoop, Emelyn Mathot, Francis Louter, David Beckwee, Christopher Mikton, Theresa Diaz, Jotheeswaran Amuthavalli Thiyagarajan, Ivan Bautmans

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Age and ageing, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Veerle KnoopGerontology Department, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, 1090 Brussels, Belgium.
Emelyn MathotGerontology Department, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, 1090 Brussels, Belgium.
Francis LouterGerontology Department, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, 1090 Brussels, Belgium.
David BeckweeGerontology Department, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, 1090 Brussels, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0001-9951-9993
Christopher MiktonDemographic Change and Healthy Aging Unit, Social Determinants of Health, World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland.
Theresa DiazEpidemiology, Monitoring and Evaluation Units, Department of Maternal, Newborn, Child and Adolescent Health and Ageing, WHO HQ, Geneva, Switzerland.
Jotheeswaran Amuthavalli ThiyagarajanAgeing and Health Unit, Department of Maternal, Newborn, Child and Adolescent Health & Ageing, WHO HQ, Geneva, Switzerland.
Ivan BautmansGerontology Department, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, 1090 Brussels, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0002-6820-9586

Funding

World Health Organization 001
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundVitality capacity (VC) is a key domain of intrinsic capacity (IC) and is the underlying biophysiological aspect of IC. Energy and metabolism (E&M) is one of the domains of VC. Fatigue is one of the main characteristics of E&M.

objectiveThe aims of this umbrella review are (i) to identify the available instruments suitable for measuring fatigue in community-dwelling older adults and (ii) to critically review the measurement properties of the identified instruments.

designUmbrella review.

settingHealthcare. SUBJECTS: Community-dwelling older adults.

methodsPubMed and Web of Knowledge were systematically screened for systematic reviews and meta-analysis reporting on fatigue instruments resulting in 2,263 articles (last search 5 December 2022). The COSMIN checklist was used to appraise psychometric properties and the AMSTAR for assessing methodological quality. Data on fatigue instruments, construct, reference period, assessment method, validated population, reliability, validity, responsiveness and predictive validity on negative health outcomes were extracted.

results10 systematic reviews and 1 meta-analysis were included in this study. 70 fatigue instruments were identified in the literature and 21 were originally designed for fatigue. The Fatigue Severity Scale (FSS), Pittsburgh Fatigability Scale (PFS) and Visual Analogue scale (VAS-F), Fatigue Impact Scale (FIS) and the Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy Fatigue (FACIT-F) presented good psychometric properties.

conclusionsThe FSS, FIS, FACIT-F, PFS and the VAS-F presented good psychometric properties in various conditions. Therefore, these instruments could be used to quantify trajectories in the domain E&M in the context of VC in community-dwelling older adults.

Indexed as

ChecklistIndependent LivingAgedFatigueHumansMeta-Analysis as TopicReproducibility of ResultsSystematic Reviews as Topicagedageingenergyfatiguefrailtyhealthy ageingindependent livingintrinsic capacityvitality capacity

Identifiers

PMID37902527
PMCPMC10615047

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.