Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37902524›Full record

SynthesisAge and ageing2023

A systematic review of the measurement properties of aspects of psychological capacity in older adults.

Candice Oster, Sonia Hines, Chris Rissel, Dennis Asante, Jyoti Khadka, Katrin M Seeher, Jotheeswaran Amuthavalli Thiyagarajan, Christopher Mikton, Theresa Diaz, Vivian Isaac

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Age and ageing, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Candice OsterCaring Futures Institute, College of Nursing & Health Sciences, Flinders University, Adelaide, Australia.
Sonia HinesCollege of Medicine & Public Health, Flinders Rural and Remote Health, Flinders University, Alice Springs, Northern Territory, Australia.
Chris RisselCollege of Medicine & Public Health, Flinders Rural and Remote Health, Flinders University, Alice Springs, Northern Territory, Australia.
Dennis AsanteCollege of Medicine & Public Health, Flinders Rural and Remote Health, Flinders University, Alice Springs, Northern Territory, Australia.
Jyoti KhadkaCaring Futures Institute, College of Nursing & Health Sciences, Flinders University, Adelaide, Australia.
Katrin M SeeherBrain Health Unit, Department of Mental Health and Substance Use, World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland.
Jotheeswaran Amuthavalli ThiyagarajanAgeing and Health Unit, Department of Maternal, Newborn, Child, Adolescent Health and Ageing, World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland.
Christopher MiktonDemographic Change and Healthy Ageing Unit, Social Determinants of Health, World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland.
Theresa DiazEpidemiology, Monitoring and Evaluation Unit, Department of Maternal, Newborn, Child, Adolescent Health and Ageing, World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland.
Vivian IsaacCollege of Medicine & Public Health, Flinders Rural and Remote Health, Flinders University, Alice Springs, Northern Territory, Australia.

Funding

World Health Organization 001
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveto examine the measurement properties of instruments that have been used to measure aspects of psychological capacity in adults aged 60 years and over.

methodsthe databases PsycINFO, MEDLINE, EMCARE and Scopus from 2010 were searched using search terms related to psychological capacity, older persons and measurement properties. Both data extraction and risk-of-bias assessment were conducted using the COSMIN (COnsensus-based Standards for the selection of health Measurement INstruments) criteria using Covidence software.

resultsthe full text of 326 articles were reviewed and a total of 30 studies were included, plus two further articles identified from reference lists (n = 32). No single instrument measuring psychological capacity was identified. Twenty (n = 20) instruments were identified that measure seven constructs of psychological capacity: Resilience; Sense of coherence; Hope; Mindfulness; Optimism; Attachment to life; Emotional regulation.

conclusionsthis systematic review identified potential measures of psychological capacity in older adults. The review will inform further work to develop a single comprehensive measure of psychological capacity in older adults.

Indexed as

ConsensusAgedAged, 80 and overDatabases, FactualHumansMiddle Agedhealthy ageingintrinsic capacityolder peoplepsychological capacitypsychometric propertysystematic review

Identifiers

PMID37902524
PMCPMC10615039

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.