Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37902257›Full record

ArticleCancer medicine2023

Therapeutic drug monitoring to personalize dosing of imatinib, sunitinib, and pazopanib: A mixed methods study on barriers and facilitators.

Kim Westerdijk, Neeltje Steeghs, Casper S J Tacke, Winette T A van der Graaf, Nielka P van Erp, Gerard van Oortmerssen, Rosella P M G Hermens, Ingrid M E Desar, Dutch Pharmacology Oncology Group (DPOG)

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cancer medicine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Kim WesterdijkDepartment of Medical Oncology, Research Institute for Medical Innovation, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0003-3512-4671
Neeltje SteeghsDepartment of Medical Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Antoni van Leeuwenhoek, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Casper S J TackeDepartment of Medical Oncology, Research Institute for Medical Innovation, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Winette T A van der GraafDepartment of Medical Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Antoni van Leeuwenhoek, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0001-7549-3338
Nielka P van ErpDepartment of Pharmacy, Research Institute for Medical Innovation, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Gerard van OortmerssenPatient Advocacy Group "Patiëntenplatform Sarcomen", Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Rosella P M G HermensDepartment of IQ Healthcare, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Ingrid M E DesarDepartment of Medical Oncology, Research Institute for Medical Innovation, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Dutch Pharmacology Oncology Group (DPOG)
Radboud University Nijmegen · NLThe Netherlands Cancer Institute · NL

Funding

KWF Kankerbestrijding 11575
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPersonalized dosing based on measurement of individual drug levels and adjusting the dose accordingly can improve efficacy and decrease unnecessary toxicity of oncological treatment. For imatinib, sunitinib, and pazopanib, this therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM)-guided dosing is, however, not routinely used, despite accumulating evidence favoring individualized dosing. Therefore, we aimed to identify and quantify (potential) barriers and facilitators in TDM-guided dosing for imatinib, sunitinib, and pazopanib.

methodsWe performed a mixed methods study among all stakeholders involved: patients, healthcare professionals (HCPs), pharmaceutical companies, and health insurance companies. During the first qualitative part of this study, we performed semi-structured individual interviews and one focus group interview to identify all (potential) barriers and facilitators, and during the second quantitative part of this study, we used a web-based survey to quantify these findings. The interviews addressed the six domains of the implementation of change model of Grol and Wensing: (1) the innovation itself; (2) the HCP; (3) the patient; (4) social context; (5) organizational context; and (6) finances, law, and governance.

resultsIn the qualitative study, we interviewed 20 patients, 18 HCPs and 10 representatives of pharmaceutical and health insurance companies and identified 72 barriers and 90 facilitators. In the quantitative study, the survey was responded by 66 HCPs and 58 patients. Important barriers were on the domain of the HCP, such as a lack of experience with TDM (36.4%), on the domain of the patient, such as lack of awareness of TDM (39.7%), and the processing time for measurement and interpretation of the TDM result (40.9%) (organizational domain). Important facilitators were education of HCPs (95.5%), education of patients (87.9%) and facilitating an overview of when and where TDM measurements are being performed (86.4%).

conclusionWe identified and quantified important barriers and facilitators for the implementation of TDM-guided dosing for imatinib, sunitinib, and pazopanib. Based on our results, the implementation strategy should mainly focus on educating both HCPs and patients and on the organizational aspect of TDM.

Indexed as

Drug MonitoringHumansImatinib MesylateIndazolesPharmaceutical PreparationsPyrimidinesSulfonamidesSunitinibImatinib MesylateIndazolespazopanibPharmaceutical PreparationsPyrimidinesSulfonamidesSunitinibbarriersfacilitatorsimplementationtherapeutic drug monitoringtyrosine kinase inhibitors

Identifiers

PMID37902257
PMCPMC10709747
OpenAlexW4388014882

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.