Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37902218›Full record

ArticleFoot & ankle international2023

Prospective Multicenter Study of Salto Talaris Ankle Arthroplasty With Minimum 4-Year Follow-Up.

Chelsea S Mathews, James Davitt, J Chris Coetzee, Jane Shofer, Daniel C Norvell, William R Ledoux, Bruce J Sangeorzan

Open access · greenAbstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in Foot & ankle international, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Chelsea S MathewsDepartment Orthopaedic Surgery and Sports Medicine, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, AR, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-8574-5295
James DavittOrthopedic + Fracture Specialists, Portland, OR, USA.
J Chris CoetzeeTwin Cities Orthopedics, Edina, MN, USA.
Jane ShoferCenter for Limb Loss and MoBility (CLiMB), VA Puget Sound Health Care System, Seattle, Washington, USA.
Daniel C NorvellCenter for Limb Loss and MoBility (CLiMB), VA Puget Sound Health Care System, Seattle, Washington, USA.
William R LedouxCenter for Limb Loss and MoBility (CLiMB), VA Puget Sound Health Care System, Seattle, Washington, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-4982-7714
Bruce J SangeorzanCenter for Limb Loss and MoBility (CLiMB), VA Puget Sound Health Care System, Seattle, Washington, USA.
University of Washington · USTwin Cities Orthopedics · USUniversity of Arkansas for Medical Sciences · USVA Puget Sound Health Care System · US

Funding

Comparing ankle arthrodesis to ankle arthroplastyR01AR056316 · NIAMS · SEATTLE INST FOR BIOMEDICAL/CLINICAL RES · PI SANGEORZAN, BRUCE · 2011 to 2016
$2.5M
NIAMS NIH HHS R01 AR056316RRD VA IK6 RX002970
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTotal ankle arthroplasty (TAA) continues to be investigated as a primary treatment for end-stage ankle arthritis. The objective of this study is to report mid- to long-term results of the Salto Talaris TAA using prospectively collected patient-reported outcomes and implant survival rates with 4- to 13-year follow-up.

methodsThis was a retrospective study of prospectively collected data from 2 multicenter cohort studies from 3 centers. Three hundred fourteen subjects who received a Salto Talaris TAA from 2005 to 2015 were included in the study. Follow-up ranged 4-13 years following index procedure. Outcomes included 36-Item Short Form Health Survey (SF-36) mental and physical component summary scores, pain scores, and adverse events including additional surgeries, revision, or removal of components.

resultsSignificant improvements were seen in pain and physical function scores at 2-year follow-up and were generally maintained through most recent follow-up. The survival rate of the prosthesis was >95% (n = 30/32 at >10 years, n = 272/282 at 4.5-10 years). Thirteen patients (4.1%) underwent revision or removal of their prosthesis. Time to revision ranged from 2 months to 6.5 years following the index procedure. Twenty-two patients (7.0%) had additional surgery that did not involve revision or removal of components.

conclusionTreatment of end-stage ankle arthritis with this implant provided patients with improved pain and functional outcome scores at mid- to long-term follow-up. The significant improvements reported at 2-4 years appeared to endure through the extended follow-up period. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III, retrospective cohort study.

Indexed as

ArthritisArthroplasty, Replacement, AnkleJoint ProsthesisAnkleAnkle JointFollow-Up StudiesHumansPainProspective StudiesReoperationRetrospective StudiesTreatment Outcomeankle arthritisSalto Talaristotal ankle arthroplastytotal ankle replacement

Identifiers

PMID37902218
PMCPMC10752572
OpenAlexW4388014000

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.