Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37902062›Full record

ArticleEnvironmental science & technology2023

Broad-Scale Assessment of Methylmercury in Adult Amphibians.

Brian J Tornabene, Blake R Hossack, Brian J Halstead, Collin A Eagles-Smith, Michael J Adams, Adam R Backlin, Adrianne B Brand, Colleen S Emery, Robert N Fisher, Jill Fleming and 12 more

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Environmental science & technology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

22 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Brian J TornabeneU.S. Geological Survey, Northern Rocky Mountain Science Center, Missoula, Montana 59801, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-2348-3119
Blake R HossackU.S. Geological Survey, Northern Rocky Mountain Science Center, Missoula, Montana 59801, United States.
Brian J HalsteadU.S. Geological Survey, Western Ecological Research Center, Dixon, California 95620, United States.
Collin A Eagles-SmithU.S. Geological Survey, Forest and Rangeland Ecosystem Science Center, Corvallis, Oregon 97331 United States.ORCID 0000-0003-1329-5285
Michael J AdamsU.S. Geological Survey, Forest and Rangeland Ecosystem Science Center, Corvallis, Oregon 97331 United States.
Adam R BacklinU.S. Geological Survey, Western Ecological Research Center, San Diego, California 92101, United States.
Adrianne B BrandU.S. Geological Survey, Eastern Ecological Science Center (Patuxent Wildlife Research Center), Turners Falls, Massachusetts 01376, United States.
Colleen S EmeryU.S. Geological Survey, Forest and Rangeland Ecosystem Science Center, Corvallis, Oregon 97331 United States.
Robert N FisherU.S. Geological Survey, Western Ecological Research Center, San Diego, California 92101, United States.
Jill FlemingU.S. Geological Survey, Eastern Ecological Science Center (Patuxent Wildlife Research Center), Turners Falls, Massachusetts 01376, United States.ORCID 0000-0003-2570-914X
Brad M GloriosoU.S. Geological Survey, Wetland and Aquatic Research Center, Lafayette, Louisiana 70506, United States.
Daniel A GrearU.S. Geological Survey, National Wildlife Health Center, Madison, Wisconsin 53711, United States.
Evan H Campbell GrantU.S. Geological Survey, Eastern Ecological Science Center (Patuxent Wildlife Research Center), Turners Falls, Massachusetts 01376, United States.
Patrick M KleemanU.S. Geological Survey, Western Ecological Research Center, Point Reyes Station, California 94956, United States.
David A W MillerDepartment of Ecosystem Science and Management, Pennsylvania State University, University Park, Pennsylvania 16802, United States.
Erin MuthsU.S. Geological Survey, Fort Collins Science Center, Fort Collins, Colorado 80526, United States.
Christopher A PearlU.S. Geological Survey, Forest and Rangeland Ecosystem Science Center, Corvallis, Oregon 97331 United States.
Jennifer C RoweU.S. Geological Survey, Forest and Rangeland Ecosystem Science Center, Corvallis, Oregon 97331 United States.
Caitlin T RumrillU.S. Geological Survey, Forest and Rangeland Ecosystem Science Center, Corvallis, Oregon 97331 United States.
J Hardin WaddleU.S. Geological Survey, Wetland and Aquatic Research Center, Gainesville, Florida 32653, United States.
Megan E WinzelerU.S. Geological Survey, National Wildlife Health Center, Madison, Wisconsin 53711, United States.
Kelly L SmallingU.S. Geological Survey, New Jersey Water Science Center, Lawrenceville, New Jersey 08648, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-1214-4920
United States Geological Survey · USPennsylvania State University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Mercury (Hg) is a toxic contaminant that has been mobilized and distributed worldwide and is a threat to many wildlife species. Amphibians are facing unprecedented global declines due to many threats including contaminants. While the biphasic life history of many amphibians creates a potential nexus for methylmercury (MeHg) exposure in aquatic habitats and subsequent health effects, the broad-scale distribution of MeHg exposure in amphibians remains unknown. We used nonlethal sampling to assess MeHg bioaccumulation in 3,241 juvenile and adult amphibians during 2017-2021. We sampled 26 populations (14 species) across 11 states in the United States, including several imperiled species that could not have been sampled by traditional lethal methods. We examined whether life history traits of species and whether the concentration of total mercury in sediment or dragonflies could be used as indicators of MeHg bioaccumulation in amphibians. Methylmercury contamination was widespread, with a 33-fold difference in concentrations across sites. Variation among years and clustered subsites was less than variation across sites. Life history characteristics such as size, sex, and whether the amphibian was a frog, toad, newt, or other salamander were the factors most strongly associated with bioaccumulation. Total Hg in dragonflies was a reliable indicator of bioaccumulation of MeHg in amphibians (R

Indexed as

MercuryMethylmercury CompoundsOdonataWater Pollutants, ChemicalAmphibiansAnimalsEnvironmental MonitoringMercuryMethylmercury CompoundsWater Pollutants, Chemicalbioindicatorcontaminantecotoxicologyfrogmercurysalamander

Identifiers

PMID37902062
PMCPMC10653216
OpenAlexW4388014689

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.