Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37901824›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in microbiology2023

The role of plant growth promoting rhizobacteria in strengthening plant resistance to fluoride toxicity: a review.

Anamika Singh, Virendra Kumar Yadav, Hemant Gautam, Lokendra Rathod, Rajendra Singh Chundawat, Gulab Singh, Rakesh Kumar Verma, Dipak Kumar Sahoo, Ashish Patel

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in microbiology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
4.0field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Synthesis and characterization of titanium dioxide nanoparticles fromFrontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2023
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Anamika SinghSchool of Liberal Arts and Sciences, Mody University of Science and Technology, Sikar, Rajasthan, India.
Virendra Kumar YadavDepartment of Life Sciences, Hemchandracharya North Gujarat University, Patan, Gujarat, India.
Hemant GautamCSIR-Institute of Genomics and Integrative Biology, New Delhi, India.
Lokendra RathodICMR-National Institute for Research in Environmental Health, Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh, India.
Rajendra Singh ChundawatSchool of Liberal Arts and Sciences, Mody University of Science and Technology, Sikar, Rajasthan, India.
Gulab SinghSchool of Liberal Arts and Sciences, Mody University of Science and Technology, Sikar, Rajasthan, India.
Rakesh Kumar VermaSchool of Liberal Arts and Sciences, Mody University of Science and Technology, Sikar, Rajasthan, India.
Dipak Kumar SahooDepartment of Veterinary Clinical Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine, Iowa State University, Ames, IA, United States.
Ashish PatelDepartment of Life Sciences, Hemchandracharya North Gujarat University, Patan, Gujarat, India.
Mody University of Science and Technology · INHemchandracharya North Gujarat University · INICMR National Institute for Research in Environmental HealthInstitute of Genomics and Integrative Biology · INIowa State University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A wide variety of bacteria are present in soil but in rhizospheric area, the majority of microbes helps plant in defending diseases and facilitate nutrient uptake. These microorganisms are supported by plants and they are known as plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria (PGPR). The PGPRs have the potential to replace chemical fertilizers in a way that is more advantageous for the environment. Fluoride (F) is one of the highly escalating, naturally present contaminants that can be hazardous for PGPRs because of its antibacterial capacity. The interactions of F with different bacterial species in groundwater systems are still not well understood. However, the interaction of PGPR with plants in the rhizosphere region reduces the detrimental effects of pollutants and increases plants' ability to endure abiotic stress. Many studies reveal that PGPRs have developed F defense mechanisms, which include efflux pumps, Intracellular sequestration, enzyme modifications, enhanced DNA repair mechanism, detoxification enzymes, ion transporter/antiporters, F riboswitches, and genetic mutations. These resistance characteristics are frequently discovered by isolating PGPRs from high F-contaminated areas or by exposing cells to fluoride in laboratory conditions. Numerous studies have identified F-resistant microorganisms that possess additional F transporters and duplicates of the well-known targets of F. Plants are prone to F accumulation despite the soil's low F content, which may negatively affect their growth and development. PGPRs can be used as efficient F bioremediators for the soil environment. Environmental biotechnology focuses on creating genetically modified rhizobacteria that can degrade F contaminants over time. The present review focuses on a thorough systemic analysis of contemporary biotechnological techniques, such as gene editing and manipulation methods, for improving plant-microbe interactions for F remediation and suggests the importance of PGPRs in improving soil health and reducing the detrimental effects of F toxicity. The most recent developments in the realm of microbial assistance in the treatment of F-contaminated environments are also highlighted.

Indexed as

bioremediationchemical fertilizersdefense systemsfluoride transportersPGPRrhizosphere

Identifiers

PMID37901824
PMCPMC10603187
OpenAlexW4387498935

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.