Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37901764›Full record

ArticleLiver cancer2023

Survival Trends in Sorafenib for Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Reconstructed Individual Patient Data Meta-Analysis of Randomized Trials.

Darren Jun Hao Tan, Ansel Shao Pin Tang, Wen Hui Lim, Cheng Han Ng, Benjamin Nah, Clarissa Fu, Jieling Xiao, Benjamin Koh, Phoebe Wen Lin Tay, Eunice X Tan and 10 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Liver cancer, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. [Ferroptosis and liver diseases].Zhejiang da xue xue bao. Yi xue ban = Journal of Zhejiang University. Medical sciences · 2024
    Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

20 authors.

Darren Jun Hao TanYong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore.
Ansel Shao Pin TangYong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore.
Wen Hui LimYong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore.
Cheng Han NgYong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore.
Benjamin NahYong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore.
Clarissa FuYong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore.
Jieling XiaoYong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore.
Benjamin KohYong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore.
Phoebe Wen Lin TayYong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore.
Eunice X TanYong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore.
Margaret TengYong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore.
Nicholas SynYong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore.
Mark D MuthiahYong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore.
Nobuharu TamakiDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Musashino Red Cross Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.
Sung Won LeeDivision of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Internal Medicine, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Beom Kyung KimDepartment of Internal Medicine, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Thomas YauDepartment of Medicine, University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR.
Arndt VogelHannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany.
Rohit LoombaDivision of Gastroenterology, NAFLD Research Center, University of California at San Diego, La Jolla, CA, USA.
Daniel Q HuangYong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore.

Funding

Yeast Genetics and Stress Response Genes-BiomedicalP42ES010337 · NIEHS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO · PI TUKEY, ROBERT H · 2000 to 2022
$69.8M
NIEHS NIH HHS P42 ES010337
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Emerging data suggest that outcomes for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) treated with sorafenib may have improved over time. We aimed to provide robust, time-to-event estimates of survival outcomes for sorafenib in advanced HCC. Summary: In this systematic review and individual patient data meta-analysis of randomized-controlled trials (RCTs), we searched MEDLINE and Embase from inception till September 2022 for RCTs that provided data for overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) for sorafenib monotherapy as first-line systemic therapy for advanced HCC. We performed a pooled analysis using reconstructed individual participant data from published Kaplan-Meier curves to obtain robust estimates for OS and PFS. Of 1,599 articles identified, 29 studies (5,525 patients) met the inclusion criteria. Overall, the median OS was 10.4 (95% CI: 9.6-11.4) months. Median OS increased over time, from 9.8 (95% CI: 8.8-10.7) months in studies before 2015 to 13.4 (95% CI: 11.03-15.24) months in studies from 2015 onwards ( Key Messages: Survival outcomes for sorafenib in advanced HCC have improved over time. These data have important implications for clinical trial design.

Indexed as

Hepatocellular carcinomaLiver cancerSystemic therapy

Identifiers

PMID37901764
PMCPMC10601853

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.