Community-Focused Policy Advocacy: Evaluating Hawai'i's Historical Trauma Legislation.

Research aimed at reducing health disparities must move beyond the academic and provide practical value. Developing policy briefs that provide a description of the current policy framework along with evidence-based recommendations that can be shared with decision-makers is one way to accomplish this. Researchers, then, can lend their authority to increase awareness moving the policy process forward. The purpose of this paper is to outline a way to develop policy briefs and provide an example of this methodological framework through a case study. The case study was developed as part of a community-engaged research project exploring the conceptualization of historical trauma among Native Hawaiian youth. The policy brief was developed by first searching the Hawai'i State Legislature database in Westlaw limiting the search to the past 10 years for legislation related to historical trauma, structural racism, or related concepts. The results encompassed 104 bills and resolutions, of which 11 passed and 93 failed to pass. Successful legislation acknowledged the role of racism to health and supported the use of trauma-informed care but stopped short of addressing historical trauma. Several gaps were identified including a failure to address collective trauma or trauma specific to colonization suggesting a reluctance to acknowledge intergenerational trauma as an element of present experiences. The policy brief developed for this project was provided to community partners to support their advocacy efforts. This manuscript showcases a process researchers can use to analyze legislative records and develop policy briefs that can support their community partners.