ArticleCase reports in ophthalmology
Sterile Corneal Infiltrates following Cataract Surgery: Case Series.
Article in Case reports in ophthalmology. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
We report a case series of 26 eyes of 26 patients undergoing planned cataract surgery from December 2021 to March 2022, who were diagnosed as having whitish round infiltrates in the surgical corneal incisions. The infiltrates were detected at the first check after 5-8 days from cataract surgery and were located either within the main corneal incision and/or in the smaller incisions. Corneal infiltrates (CIs) were single or multiple, without epithelial defects, and painless. All infiltrates were initially treated with full topical antibiotic coverage, in order to control eventual and serious postsurgical infection. However, at daily checks, the clinical course of CIs suggested a sterile etiology. For this reason, steroidal topical treatment was maintained for a long time with slow tapering until complete remission of the CIs. All infiltrates resolved completely in around 30-40 days. The surgical instruments and the sterilization process were scrutinized. A white amorphous material was found mainly on non-disposable anterior chamber cannulas and on irrigation/aspiration tips. Disposable cannulas were adopted, and machinery for cleaning and sterilization procedures were reviewed, with specific reference to water softener renewal. Thanks to these precautions, CIs never occurred again. Finally, our hypothesis was an immune corneal reaction to amorphous deposit on cannula tips. This case series describes a previously unknown complication of cataract surgery and our experience might be useful for other surgeons.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.