Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37901539›Full record

ArticleACS omega2023

DataPype: A Fully Automated Unified Software Platform for Computer-Aided Drug Design.

Mohemmed Faraz Khan, Shubhangi Kandwal, Darren Fayne

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in ACS omega, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Mohemmed Faraz KhanMolecular Design Group, School of Biochemistry and Immunology, Trinity Biomedical Sciences Institute, Trinity College Dublin, Dublin 2, Ireland.
Shubhangi KandwalMolecular Design Group, School of Biochemistry and Immunology, Trinity Biomedical Sciences Institute, Trinity College Dublin, Dublin 2, Ireland.
Darren FayneMolecular Design Group, School of Biochemistry and Immunology, Trinity Biomedical Sciences Institute, Trinity College Dublin, Dublin 2, Ireland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2417-5406

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

With the advent of computer-aided drug design (CADD), traditional physical testing of thousands of molecules has now been replaced by target-focused drug discovery, where potentially bioactive molecules are predicted by computer software before their physical synthesis. However, despite being a significant breakthrough, CADD still faces various limitations and challenges. The increasing availability of data on small molecules has created a need to streamline the sourcing of data from different databases and automate the processing and cleaning of data into a form that can be used by multiple CADD software applications. Several standalone software packages are available to aid the drug designer, each with its own specific application, requiring specialized knowledge and expertise for optimal use. These applications require their own input and output files, making it a challenge for nonexpert users or multidisciplinary discovery teams. Here, we have developed a new software platform called DataPype, which wraps around these different software packages. It provides a unified automated workflow to search for hit compounds using specialist software. Additionally, multiple virtual screening packages can be used in the one workflow, and if different ways of looking at potential hit compounds all predict the same set of molecules, we have higher confidence that we should make or purchase and test the molecules. Importantly, DataPype can run on computer servers, speeding up the virtual screening for new compounds. Combining access to multiple CADD tools within one interface will enhance the early stage of drug discovery, increase usability, and enable the use of parallel computing.

Identifiers

PMID37901539
PMCPMC10601415

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.