Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37901504›Full record

ArticleACS omega2023

Ion and Stable Isotope Geochemistry of Produced Water in Coalbed Methane Wells in the Tiefa Basin.

Huazhou Huang, Chuanxia Tong, Zhengqing Wu, Junjie Ding, Zaixing Huang, Huan He, Jinbo Zhang

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in ACS omega, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
0.2field-weighted citation impact, top 48% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Huazhou HuangJiangsu Key Laboratory of Coal-Based Greenhouse Gas Control and Utilization, China University of Mining and Technology, Xuzhou 221008, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7006-9941
Chuanxia TongThe Third Exploration Team of Anhui Coalfield Geology Bureau, Suzhou 234000, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4429-7160
Zhengqing WuThe Third Exploration Team of Anhui Coalfield Geology Bureau, Suzhou 234000, China.
Junjie DingYellow River Engineering Consulting Co., Ltd., Zhengzhou 450003, China.
Zaixing HuangSchool of Chemical Engineering and Technology, China University of Mining and Technology, Xuzhou 221116, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4827-046X
Huan HeSchool of Chemical Engineering and Technology, China University of Mining and Technology, Xuzhou 221116, China.
Jinbo ZhangKey Laboratory of Coalbed Methane Resources and Reservoir Formation Process, China University of Mining and Technology, Ministry of Education, Xuzhou 221008, China.
China University of Mining and Technology · CNGansu Coalfield Geology Bureau · CNYellow River Institute of Hydraulic Research · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The potential geochemical information in the produced water of coalbed methane (CBM) wells is conducive to the exploration and development of CBM in the case that the produced water is primitive formation water. A total of 58 produced water samples collected from 13 CBM wells in the Daxing Mine, Tiefa Basin, were investigated. Ionic composition tests and stable isotope analysis were conducted to explore the geochemical characteristics and sources of produced water as well as the method for determining whether the produced water is primitive formation water. The results suggest that the fracking fluid for CBM stimulations is the main factor affecting the ion change of the produced water in the initial stage of drainage. The concentrations of Cl

Identifiers

PMID37901504
PMCPMC10601432
OpenAlexW4387606836

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.