Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37901489›Full record

ArticleACS omega2023

Effect of Alkali Fusion Methods on the Preparation of One-Part Geopolymer From Coal Gasification Slag.

Changshuai Chen, Keiko Sasaki, Quanzhi Tian, Haijun Zhang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in ACS omega, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Changshuai ChenSchool of Chemical Engineering and Technology, China University of Mining and Technology, Xuzhou 221116Jiangsu ,China.
Keiko SasakiDepartment of Earth Resources Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Kyushu University, 744 Motooka, Nishiku, Fukuoka 819-0395, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2882-0700
Quanzhi TianNational Engineering Research Center of Coal Preparation and Purification, China University of Mining and Technology, Xuzhou 221116Jiangsu ,China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7729-253X
Haijun ZhangSchool of Chemical Engineering and Technology, China University of Mining and Technology, Xuzhou 221116Jiangsu ,China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study investigated the one-part geopolymer synthesis by coal gasification slag through a calcination treatment. Two preparation methods, the traditional alkali fusion method (M-I) and the alkali fusion and modification method (M-II), were compared to illustrate the more suitable way for coal gasification slag-based one-part geopolymer (CGS-based geopolymer) synthesis. The reaction products and structure of the geopolymer were tested by XRD, FTIR, TG-DTG, and SEM. The results showed that the compressive strength of geopolymers prepared by M-I was raised as the NaOH amount increased, and the maximum compressive strength of geopolymers was achieved at 8.44 MPa. The low compressive strength suggested that M-I failed to be used for CGS-based geopolymer synthesis. When solid NaOH was selected for one-part geopolymer synthesis by M-II, the geopolymer possessed a compressive strength of 25.52 MPa and exhibited a well-combined and dense matrix. More Si and Al species in F-SH could be released for geopolymerization, and the coal gasification slag additive could be partially dissolved and act as the filler in the geopolymer matrix, which enhanced the geopolymerization degree. The M-II has been proven to be more suitable for preparing CGS-based geopolymers than the M-I.

Identifiers

PMID37901489
PMCPMC10601422

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.