Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37901411›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in medicine2023

Time to change? Present and prospects of hemorrhoidal classification.

Ling Wang, Jiachun Ni, Changcheng Hou, Di Wu, Li Sun, Qiong Jiang, Zengjin Cai, Wenbin Fan

Registry-linked trialAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in medicine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07427927 (Data-driven Clustering in Hemorrhoid Surgery), which is not on this map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT07427927 enrolling by invitationnot on this mapstarted 2024, after this paper: background citation

Data-driven Clustering in Hemorrhoid Surgery: Retrospective Monocentric Study for the Identification of Clinical Phenotypes

TypeobservationalSponsorIRCCS Policlinico S. DonatoRan2024 to 2026Enrolled100ConditionsHemorrhoid, Hemorrhoid ProlapseArmsAny surgical procedure for hemorrhoidal disease
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Observational
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Ling Wang *Chongqing College of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Chongqing, China.
Jiachun Ni *Department of Coloproctology, Yueyang Hospital of Integrated Traditional Chinese and Western Medicine, Shanghai University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Shanghai, China.
Changcheng HouDepartment of Proctology, Yongchuan Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, China.
Di WuChongqing Medical University, Chongqing, China.
Li SunChongqing Medical University, Chongqing, China.
Qiong JiangChongqing Medical University, Chongqing, China.
Zengjin CaiDepartment of Proctology, Yongchuan Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, China.
Wenbin FanChongqing College of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Chongqing, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

As a common benign anal condition, the high incidence and recurrence of hemorrhoids pose challenges for both patients and doctors. The classification of hemorrhoids plays a crucial role in assessing, diagnosing, and treating the condition. By using appropriate classification and corresponding treatment strategies, we can achieve higher cure rates and lower recurrence rates of hemorrhoids. Since the introduction of the Miles classification in 1919, various classifications have been developed, which include objective classifications based on anatomical or instrumental assessment and subjective classifications based on symptoms and patient sensations. These classifications aim to accurately evaluate the condition. In this study, we discuss the evaluation values of each classification in terms of their advantages, disadvantages, treatment relevance, reproducibility, practicality, and assessment value. We also analyze the significant and essential factors, principles of use, and components of assessment indicators of hemorrhoidal classification. This study proposes several strategies to address the limitations of current hemorrhoidal assessment methods. All these will provide a reference for the development regarding the assessment and classification of hemorrhoids and clinical diagnosis and management of hemorrhoids.

Indexed as

classificationhemorrhoidsreviewsurgical operativesurgical procedures

Identifiers

PMID37901411
PMCPMC10603225

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.