Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37901197›Full record

ArticleLiver cancer2023

Achievement of Complete Response and Drug-Free Status by Atezolizumab plus Bevacizumab Combined with or without Curative Conversion in Patients with Transarterial Chemoembolization-Unsuitable, Intermediate-Stage Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Multicenter Proof-Of-Concept Study.

Masatoshi Kudo, Tomoko Aoki, Kazuomi Ueshima, Kaoru Tsuchiya, Masahiro Morita, Hirokazu Chishina, Masahiro Takita, Satoru Hagiwara, Yasunori Minami, Hiroshi Ida and 12 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Liver cancer, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 110 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
110citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

110 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Guideline
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Guideline
  5. Trial
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article

50 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

22 authors.

Masatoshi KudoDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Kindai University Faculty of Medicine, Osaka, Japan.
Tomoko AokiDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Kindai University Faculty of Medicine, Osaka, Japan.
Kazuomi UeshimaDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Kindai University Faculty of Medicine, Osaka, Japan.
Kaoru TsuchiyaDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Musashino Red Cross Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.
Masahiro MoritaDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Kindai University Faculty of Medicine, Osaka, Japan.
Hirokazu ChishinaDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Kindai University Faculty of Medicine, Osaka, Japan.
Masahiro TakitaDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Kindai University Faculty of Medicine, Osaka, Japan.
Satoru HagiwaraDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Kindai University Faculty of Medicine, Osaka, Japan.
Yasunori MinamiDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Kindai University Faculty of Medicine, Osaka, Japan.
Hiroshi IdaDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Kindai University Faculty of Medicine, Osaka, Japan.
Naoshi NishidaDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Kindai University Faculty of Medicine, Osaka, Japan.
Chikara OgawaDepartment of Gastroenterology, Takamatsu Red Cross Hospital, Takamatsu, Japan.
Tetsu TomonariDepartment of Gastroenterology and Oncology, Tokushima University Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, Tokushima, Japan.
Noriaki NakamuraDepartment of Surgery, Shuuwa General Hospital, Saitama, Japan.
Hidekatsu KurodaDivision of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Internal Medicine, School of Medicine, Iwate Medical University, Yahaba, Japan.
Atsushi TakebeDepartment of Surgery, Kindai University Faculty of Medicine, Osaka, Japan.
Yoshifumi TakeyamaDepartment of Surgery, Kindai University Faculty of Medicine, Osaka, Japan.
Masaaki HidakaDepartment of Surgery, Nagasaki University Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, Nagasaki, Japan.
Susumu EguchiDepartment of Surgery, Nagasaki University Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, Nagasaki, Japan.
Stephen L ChanState Key Laboratory of Translational Oncology, Department of Clinical Oncology, Sir YK Pao Centre for Cancer, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China.
Masayuki KurosakiDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Musashino Red Cross Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.
Namiki IzumiDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Musashino Red Cross Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Atezolizumab plus bevacizumab therapy is extremely effective in the treatment of intermediate-stage hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), with a response rate of 44%, as reported in the IMbrave150 trial. When tumor shrinkage is obtained, achieving complete response (CR) is possible in many cases using curative conversion with resection, ablation, or superselective transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) with curative intent. This concept, i.e., curative conversion by combining systemic therapy and locoregional therapy, has not been reported before. This multicenter proof-of-concept study was conducted to show the value of curative conversion in immunotherapy-treated intermediate-stage HCC meeting TACE-unsuitable criteria. Methods: This study included 110 consecutive Child-Pugh A patients who received atezolizumab plus bevacizumab as first-line treatment for unresectable and TACE-unsuitable intermediate-stage HCC at seven centers in Japan. CR rate, drug-free rate, time to CR, change in liver function, efficacy in positron emission tomography (PET)-positive HCC, progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS) were assessed in patients who achieved CR using resection, ablation, superselective TACE with curative intent following atezolizumab plus bevacizumab or atezolizumab plus bevacizumab alone. Results: Clinical or pathological CR was achieved in 38 patients (35%) (median observation period: 21.2 months). The modalities of curative conversion in 35 patients were as follows: resection, 7; ablation, 13; and superselective TACE, 15. Three patients achieved clinical CR with atezolizumab plus bevacizumab therapy alone. Among the 38 CR patients, 25 achieved drug-free status. PFS was not reached, and 3 patients experienced recurrence after reaching CR. Regarding OS, there were no deaths in any of the CR patients. The albumin-bilirubin score did not deteriorate after locoregional therapy or resection. Of seven PET-positive patients who achieved CR with atezolizumab plus bevacizumab followed by curative conversion, five achieved drug-free status. Conclusion: The achievement of CR rate by curative conversion in patients treated with atezolizumab plus bevacizumab as the preceding therapy for unresectable and TACE-unsuitable intermediate-stage HCC was 35%. Overall, 23% of patients achieved drug-free status and no recurrence was observed from this patient subgroup with CR and drug-free status. Thus, achieving CR and/or drug-free status should be a therapeutic goal for patients with intermediate-stage HCC without vascular invasion or extrahepatic spread.

Indexed as

AblationAtezolizumab plus bevacizumabCancer-freeCurative conversionHepatocellular carcinomaResectionTransarterial chemoembolizationTreatment-free

Identifiers

PMID37901197
PMCPMC10603621

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.