Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37901102›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in veterinary science2023

Comparative pathology of experimental pulmonary tuberculosis in animal models.

Laura Hunter, Inés Ruedas-Torres, Irene Agulló-Ros, Emma Rayner, Francisco J Salguero

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in veterinary science, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
4.3field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Novel Multistage SubunitVaccines · 2025
    Article
  6. Transcriptomic insights intoThe veterinary quarterly · 2025
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Model systems to studyFrontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2025
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Challenge Dose Titration in aInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2024
    Article
  16. Immunopathology of PulmonaryInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2024
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Laura HunterPathology Department, UK Health Security Agency (UKHSA), Porton Down, Salisbury, United Kingdom.
Inés Ruedas-TorresPathology Department, UK Health Security Agency (UKHSA), Porton Down, Salisbury, United Kingdom.
Irene Agulló-RosPathology Department, UK Health Security Agency (UKHSA), Porton Down, Salisbury, United Kingdom.
Emma RaynerPathology Department, UK Health Security Agency (UKHSA), Porton Down, Salisbury, United Kingdom.
Francisco J SalgueroPathology Department, UK Health Security Agency (UKHSA), Porton Down, Salisbury, United Kingdom.
UK Health Security Agency · GBUniversity of Surrey · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Research in human tuberculosis (TB) is limited by the availability of human tissues from patients, which is often altered by therapy and treatment. Thus, the use of animal models is a key tool in increasing our understanding of the pathogenesis, disease progression and preclinical evaluation of new therapies and vaccines. The granuloma is the hallmark lesion of pulmonary tuberculosis, regardless of the species or animal model used. Although animal models may not fully replicate all the histopathological characteristics observed in natural, human TB disease, each one brings its own attributes which enable researchers to answer specific questions regarding TB immunopathogenesis. This review delves into the pulmonary pathology induced by

Indexed as

animal modelsgranulomalungmycobacteriapathologytuberculosis

Identifiers

PMID37901102
PMCPMC10602689
OpenAlexW4387579836

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.