ArticleFrontiers in psychology2023
Comparison of category and letter fluency tasks through automated analysis.
Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Item-Level Analysis of Category Fluency Test Performance: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Studies of Normal and Neurologically Abnormal Ageing.Neuropsychology review · 2025Pooled it
- Unique signatures in verbal fluency task performance in schizophrenia and depression.Schizophrenia research. Cognition · 2026Article
- Clarifying Fundamental Role of Symbol Coding in Cognitive Networks in Schizophrenia and Healthy Controls Leveraging Gaussian Graphical Models and Bayesian Networks.Schizophrenia bulletin · 2026Article
- Rapid Lexical Retrieval and Executive Functioning in Very Mild Aphasia.American journal of speech-language pathology · 2026Article
- Tactile sensation moderates the association between hand dexterity and higher-level cognition in older adults with and without MCI.Frontiers in aging neuroscience · 2026Article
- Feasibility of Immersive Virtual Reality for Delivering Semantic Feature Analysis to Adults with Communication Disorders and Normal Cognitive Aging.International journal of telerehabilitation · 2026Article
- Developing digital health technologies for frontotemporal degeneration.Alzheimer's & dementia : the journal of the Alzheimer's Association · 2025Review
- Clinical efficacy of pre-trained large language models through the lens of aphasia.Scientific reports · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Category and letter fluency tasks are commonly used neuropsychological tasks to evaluate lexical retrieval. Methods: This study used validated automated methods, which allow for more expansive investigation, to analyze speech production of both category ("Animal") and letter ("F") fluency tasks produced by healthy participants ( Results: Participants produced significantly more words on the category fluency task relative to the letter fluency task ( Discussion: These findings showed that certain lexical measures such as AoA, word familiarity, and semantic ambiguity were important for understanding how these tasks differ. Additionally, it found that acoustic measures such as inter-word RT and word duration are also imperative to analyze when comparing the two tasks. By implementing these automated techniques, which are reproducible and scalable, to analyze fluency tasks we were able to quickly detect these differences. In future clinical settings, we expect these methods to expand our knowledge on speech feature differences that impact not only total scores, but many other speech measures among clinical populations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.