ArticleSAGE open medicine2023
Urinary and anal incontinence in pregnancy in a Nigerian population: A prospective longitudinal study.
Article in SAGE open medicine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.
- Prevalence of urinary incontinence during pregnancy and associated risk factors: A cross-sectional study.Journal of family medicine and primary care · 2026Article
- Construction and Evaluation of a Risk Prediction Model for Stress Urinary Incontinence in Late Pregnancy Based on Clinical Factors and Pelvic Floor Ultrasound Parameters.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objectives: There are several studies from sub-Saharan Africa on postpartum urinary incontinence and anal incontinence, but very rare in pregnancy. Such data will guide obstetric caregivers in providing appropriate counseling to the women as well as in minimizing the risk factors. This study aimed to determine the comparative effects of different trimesters of pregnancy on urinary incontinence and anal incontinence, and their possible risk factors. Methods: The study was longitudinal in design, and the study population consisted of 223 pregnant women receiving care at the two largest tertiary health institutions in Enugu, South-East Nigeria. The recruitment was in the first trimester and the women were followed up to term. Interviews were conducted at specific times in the three trimesters and data regarding urinary incontinence and anal incontinence symptoms were obtained using validated questionnaires. Results: The incidence of urinary incontinence increased across the trimesters: 22%, 30.5%, and 48% in the first trimester, second, and third trimesters, respectively, with a cumulative incidence rate of 50.2%. The incidence of anal incontinence also increased across the trimesters but not as high as urinary incontinence: 1.7%, 3.6%, and 5.8%, respectively, with a cumulative incidence rate of 6.7%. The risk factors for urinary incontinence were maternal age >35 years, multiparity, previous prolonged second-stage labor, and previous history of neonatal macrosomia, while that of anal incontinence were previous instrumental vaginal delivery and previous prolonged second stage of labor. Conclusion: Our study demonstrated an increase in the incidence of urinary incontinence and anal incontinence as pregnancy advances. Obstetricians are therefore encouraged to discuss these pelvic floor issues during antenatal care services and make more efforts toward reducing the modifying obstetric risk factors.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.