Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37900756›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in plant science2023

An effective approach for plant leaf diseases classification based on a novel DeepPlantNet deep learning model.

Naeem Ullah, Javed Ali Khan, Sultan Almakdi, Mohammed S Alshehri, Mimonah Al Qathrady, Nora El-Rashidy, Shaker El-Sappagh, Farman Ali

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in plant science, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
23.0field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 58 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Anatomical study and early diagnosis of dome galls inFrontiers in artificial intelligence · 2025
    Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 6 institutions in 5 countries.

Naeem UllahDepartment of Software Engineering, University of Engineering and Technology, Taxila, Pakistan.
Javed Ali KhanDepartment of Computer Science, Faculty of Physics, Engineering, and Computer Science, University of Hertfordshire, Hatfield, United Kingdom.
Sultan AlmakdiDepartment of Computer Science, College of Computer Science and Information System, Najran University, Najran, Saudi Arabia.
Mohammed S AlshehriDepartment of Computer Science, College of Computer Science and Information System, Najran University, Najran, Saudi Arabia.
Mimonah Al QathradyDepartments of Information Systems, College of Computer Science and Information Systems, Najran University, Najran, Saudi Arabia.
Nora El-RashidyMachine Learning and Information Retrieval Department, Faculty of Artificial Intelligence, Kaferelshikh University, Kafr El-Shaikh, Egypt.
Shaker El-SappaghFaculty of Computer Science and Engineering, Galala University, Suez, Egypt.
Farman AliDepartment of Computer Science and Engineering, School of Convergence, College of Computing and Informatics, Sungkyunkwan University, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Najran University · SABenha University · EGKafrelsheikh University · EGSungkyunkwan University · KRUniversity of Engineering and Technology Taxila · PKUniversity of Hertfordshire · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Recently, plant disease detection and diagnosis procedures have become a primary agricultural concern. Early detection of plant diseases enables farmers to take preventative action, stopping the disease's transmission to other plant sections. Plant diseases are a severe hazard to food safety, but because the essential infrastructure is missing in various places around the globe, quick disease diagnosis is still difficult. The plant may experience a variety of attacks, from minor damage to total devastation, depending on how severe the infections are. Thus, early detection of plant diseases is necessary to optimize output to prevent such destruction. The physical examination of plant diseases produced low accuracy, required a lot of time, and could not accurately anticipate the plant disease. Creating an automated method capable of accurately classifying to deal with these issues is vital. Method: This research proposes an efficient, novel, and lightweight DeepPlantNet deep learning (DL)-based architecture for predicting and categorizing plant leaf diseases. The proposed DeepPlantNet model comprises 28 learned layers, i.e., 25 convolutional layers (ConV) and three fully connected (FC) layers. The framework employed Leaky RelU (LReLU), batch normalization (BN), fire modules, and a mix of 3×3 and 1×1 filters, making it a novel plant disease classification framework. The Proposed DeepPlantNet model can categorize plant disease images into many classifications. Results: The proposed approach categorizes the plant diseases into the following ten groups: Apple_Black_rot (ABR), Cherry_(including_sour)_Powdery_mildew (CPM), Grape_Leaf_blight_(Isariopsis_Leaf_Spot) (GLB), Peach_Bacterial_spot (PBS), Pepper_bell_Bacterial_spot (PBBS), Potato_Early_blight (PEB), Squash_Powdery_mildew (SPM), Strawberry_Leaf_scorch (SLS), bacterial tomato spot (TBS), and maize common rust (MCR). The proposed framework achieved an average accuracy of 98.49 and 99.85in the case of eight-class and three-class classification schemes, respectively. Discussion: The experimental findings demonstrated the DeepPlantNet model's superiority to the alternatives. The proposed technique can reduce financial and agricultural output losses by quickly and effectively assisting professionals and farmers in identifying plant leaf diseases.

Indexed as

artificial intelligencedeep learningDeepPlantNetleaf diseasesplant diseases classification

Identifiers

PMID37900756
PMCPMC10600380
OpenAlexW4387539845

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.