Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37900749›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in plant science2023

Multi-locus genome-wide association studies reveal the genetic architecture of

Jemanesh K Haile, Demissew Sertse, Amidou N'Diaye, Valentyna Klymiuk, Krystalee Wiebe, Yuefeng Ruan, Harmeet S Chawla, Maria-Antonia Henriquez, Lipu Wang, Hadley R Kutcher and 3 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in plant science, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.4field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Transcriptional Response of Durum Wheat During Interaction withInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Jemanesh K HaileDepartment of Plant Sciences, Crop Development Centre, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, SK, Canada.
Demissew SertseAquatic and Crop Resource Development, National Research Council Canada, Saskatoon, SK, Canada.
Amidou N'DiayeDepartment of Plant Sciences, Crop Development Centre, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, SK, Canada.
Valentyna KlymiukDepartment of Plant Sciences, Crop Development Centre, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, SK, Canada.
Krystalee WiebeDepartment of Plant Sciences, Crop Development Centre, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, SK, Canada.
Yuefeng RuanSwift Current Research and Development Centre, Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada, Swift Current, SK, Canada.
Harmeet S ChawlaDepartment of Plant Sciences, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, MB, Canada.
Maria-Antonia HenriquezMorden Research and Development Centre, Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada, Morden, MB, Canada.
Lipu WangDepartment of Plant Sciences, Crop Development Centre, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, SK, Canada.
Hadley R KutcherDepartment of Plant Sciences, Crop Development Centre, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, SK, Canada.
Barbara SteinerDepartment of Agrobiotechnology, Institute of Biotechnology in Plant Production, University of Natural Resources and Life Sciences Vienna, Tulln, Austria.
Hermann BuerstmayrDepartment of Agrobiotechnology, Institute of Biotechnology in Plant Production, University of Natural Resources and Life Sciences Vienna, Tulln, Austria.
Curtis J PozniakDepartment of Plant Sciences, Crop Development Centre, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, SK, Canada.
University of Saskatchewan · CAAgriculture and Agri-Food Canada · CABOKU University · ATSaskatchewan Research Council (Canada) · CAUniversity of Manitoba · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Durum wheat is more susceptible to Fusarium head blight (FHB) than other types or classes of wheat. The disease is one of the most devastating in wheat; it reduces yield and end-use quality and contaminates the grain with fungal mycotoxins such as deoxynivalenol (DON). A panel of 265 Canadian and European durum wheat cultivars, as well as breeding and experimental lines, were tested in artificially inoculated field environments (2019-2022, inclusive) and two greenhouse trials (2019 and 2020). The trials were assessed for FHB severity and incidence, visual rating index,

Indexed as

DONdurum wheatFHB resistanceGDPGWASKASP markersmulti-locus

Identifiers

PMID37900749
PMCPMC10601657
OpenAlexW4387571338

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.