Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37900571›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in cardiovascular medicine2023

Ensemble learning of myocardial displacements for myocardial infarction detection in echocardiography.

Tuan Nguyen, Phi Nguyen, Dai Tran, Hung Pham, Quang Nguyen, Thanh Le, Hanh Van, Bach Do, Phuong Tran, Vinh Le and 3 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Tuan Nguyen *VinUni-Illinois Smart Health Center, VinUniversity, Hanoi, Vietnam.
Phi Nguyen *Institute for Artificial Intelligence, VNU University of Engineering and Technology, Hanoi, Vietnam.
Dai TranCardiovascular Center, E Hospital, Hanoi, Vietnam.
Hung PhamVietnam National Heart Institute, Bach Mai Hospital, Hanoi, Vietnam.
Quang NguyenVietnam National Heart Institute, Bach Mai Hospital, Hanoi, Vietnam.
Thanh LeVietnam National Heart Institute, Bach Mai Hospital, Hanoi, Vietnam.
Hanh VanVietnam National Heart Institute, Bach Mai Hospital, Hanoi, Vietnam.
Bach DoVietnam National Heart Institute, Bach Mai Hospital, Hanoi, Vietnam.
Phuong TranVietnam National Heart Institute, Bach Mai Hospital, Hanoi, Vietnam.
Vinh LeFaculty of Information Technology, VNU University of Engineering and Technology, Hanoi, Vietnam.
Thuy NguyenFaculty of Information Technology, VNU University of Engineering and Technology, Hanoi, Vietnam.
Long TranInstitute for Artificial Intelligence, VNU University of Engineering and Technology, Hanoi, Vietnam.
Hieu PhamVinUni-Illinois Smart Health Center, VinUniversity, Hanoi, Vietnam.
VinUniversity · VNBạch Mai Hospital · VNVNU University of Science · VNViet Duc Hospital · VN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Early detection and localization of myocardial infarction (MI) can reduce the severity of cardiac damage through timely treatment interventions. In recent years, deep learning techniques have shown promise for detecting MI in echocardiographic images. Existing attempts typically formulate this task as classification and rely on a single segmentation model to estimate myocardial segment displacements. However, there has been no examination of how segmentation accuracy affects MI classification performance or the potential benefits of using ensemble learning approaches. Our study investigates this relationship and introduces a robust method that combines features from multiple segmentation models to improve MI classification performance by leveraging ensemble learning. Materials and Methods: Our method combines myocardial segment displacement features from multiple segmentation models, which are then input into a typical classifier to estimate the risk of MI. We validated the proposed approach on two datasets: the public HMC-QU dataset (109 echocardiograms) for training and validation, and an E-Hospital dataset (60 echocardiograms) from a local clinical site in Vietnam for independent testing. Model performance was evaluated based on accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity. Results: The proposed approach demonstrated excellent performance in detecting MI. It achieved an F1 score of 0.942, corresponding to an accuracy of 91.4%, a sensitivity of 94.1%, and a specificity of 88.3%. The results showed that the proposed approach outperformed the state-of-the-art feature-based method, which had a precision of 85.2%, a specificity of 70.1%, a sensitivity of 85.9%, an accuracy of 85.5%, and an accuracy of 80.2% on the HMC-QU dataset. On the external validation set, the proposed model still performed well, with an F1 score of 0.8, an accuracy of 76.7%, a sensitivity of 77.8%, and a specificity of 75.0%. Conclusions: Our study demonstrated the ability to accurately predict MI in echocardiograms by combining information from several segmentation models. Further research is necessary to determine its potential use in clinical settings as a tool to assist cardiologists and technicians with objective assessments and reduce dependence on operator subjectivity. Our research codes are available on GitHub at https://github.com/vinuni-vishc/mi-detection-echo.

Indexed as

deep learningdiagnostic abilityechocardiographyimage segmentationmachine learningmotion estimationmyocardial infarctionregional wall motion abnormality

Identifiers

PMID37900571
PMCPMC10613081
OpenAlexW4387609764

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.