Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37900344›Full record

ArticleSisli Etfal Hastanesi tip bulteni2023

Can the Combination of Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Neutrophil-to-Lymphocyte Ratio and Platelet-to-Lymphocyte Ratio Predict the Mass Origin in Ovarian Masses?

Merve Aldikactioglu Talmac, Tolga Ciftpinar, Merve Sam Ozdemir, Aytul Hande Yardimci, Izel Gunay, Nilufer Cetinkaya Kocadal

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Sisli Etfal Hastanesi tip bulteni, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 26% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 3 countries.

Merve Aldikactioglu TalmacDepartment of Gynecological Oncology, University of Health Sciences Türkiye, Basaksehir Cam and Sakura City Hospital, Istanbul, Türkiye.
Tolga CiftpinarDepartment of Gynecological Oncology, University of Health Sciences Türkiye, Basaksehir Cam and Sakura City Hospital, Istanbul, Türkiye.
Merve Sam OzdemirDepartment of Radiology, University of Health Sciences Türkiye, Basaksehir Cam and Sakura City Hospital, Istanbul, Türkiye.
Aytul Hande YardimciDepartment of Radiology, University of Health Sciences Türkiye, Basaksehir Cam and Sakura City Hospital, Istanbul, Türkiye.
Izel GunayDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Health Sciences Türkiye, Basaksehir Cam and Sakura City Hospital, Istanbul, Türkiye.
Nilufer Cetinkaya KocadalDepartment of Gynecological Oncology, University of Health Sciences Türkiye, Basaksehir Cam and Sakura City Hospital, Istanbul, Türkiye.
İstanbul Başakşehir Çam ve Sakura Şehir Hastanesi

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: Evaluate the effectiveness of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), blood parameters, and tumor markers to determine the role of objective criteria in distinguishing malignant, borderline, and benign masses and to minimize unnecessary surgical interventions by reducing interpretation differences. Methods: The histopathological and clinical-laboratory results of the patients who underwent surgery for the initial diagnosis and whose ovarian masses were confirmed were retrospectively reviewed. Between groups, age, cancer antigen 125, mean platelet volume (MPV), neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR), the presence of ascites, the ovarian-adnexal reporting and data system MRI scores, mass characteristics, and lymphocyte count were compared. Results: The study comprised a total of 191 patients. These patients were categorized into three groups: Benign (n=113), borderline (n=26), and malignant (n=52). No noteworthy correlation was detected between the unilocular or multilocular nature of solid, cystic, or mixed masses and the rates of NLR, PLR, or MPV. However, a notable correlation was identified between NLR and the presence of acidity (p=0.003). In ovarian cancer patients, there was no significant difference in NLR and MPV between malignant epithelial and malignant sex cord-stromal types (p>0.05), whereas a significant difference emerged in the PLR ratio (p=0.013). Conclusion: In ovarian masses with malignant potential, laboratory parameters such as NLR and PLR can guide the diagnosis process. In the future, various studies such as the development of different tests, markers, and imaging methods, the use of blood tests such as NLR, PLR, and MPV in cancer diagnosis will be possible. The results of these studies may contribute to the development of new methods for the diagnosis of ovarian cancer and the improvement of treatment protocols.

Indexed as

Mean platelet volumeneutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratioovarian-adnexal reporting and data systemplatelet-to-lymphocyte ratio

Identifiers

PMID37900344
PMCPMC10600603
OpenAlexW4387194795

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.