ArticleSisli Etfal Hastanesi tip bulteni2023
Naples Prognostic Score and Clinical Outcomes in Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension Patients.
Article in Sisli Etfal Hastanesi tip bulteni, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.
- The Naples Prognostic Score May Predict No Reflow in Patients Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention for Saphenous Vein Graft Stenosis.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Relationship Between the Naples Prognostic Score and Saphenous Vein Graft Disease after Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting Surgery.Arquivos brasileiros de cardiologia · 2025Article
- Evaluation of NAPLES Prognostic Score to Predict Long-Term Mortality in Patients with Pulmonary Embolism.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- The predictive value of Naples prognostic score for patients with locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer undergoing surgery after neoadjuvant chemotherapy.Frontiers in immunology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objectives: Pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) is a specific form of pulmonary hypertension characterized by an increased mean pulmonary arterial pressure. Risk stratification is crucial in managing PAH, using various clinical, laboratory, and imaging parameters. The Naples prognostic score (NPS), incorporating nutritional and inflammatory markers, has demonstrated prognostic value in other conditions but not in PAH. The goal of this study was to appraise the importance of NPS as a prognostic indicator for patients with PAH. Methods: This retrospective study involved 101 PAH patients. Echocardiographic, laboratory, and right heart catheterization data were collected. Statistical analyses compared variables between survivors and non-survivors, and multivariate logistic regression identified mortality risk factors. Results: Among the 101 patients, 18 died within the follow-up period. The mortality group showed elevated levels of B-type natriuretic peptide (BNP) and significantly higher median NPS. Patients were categorized based on their NPS scores, revealing higher mortality in Group 2. Multivariate logistic regression identified age and BNP levels as independent predictors of mortality. The inclusion of NPS in the model further reinforced its association with mortality. Conclusion: The study suggests that NPS is linked to poor outcomes in PAH patients. NPS, a straightforward and easily calculated score, holds the potential to predict the clinical trajectory of PAH, offering advantages for risk assessment in this population.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.