ArticleRespirology case reports2023
Thoracic SMARCA4-deficient undifferentiated tumour: Diagnostic challenges and potential for misdiagnosis in small tissue samples.
Article in Respirology case reports, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
- SMARCA4-Deficient Undifferentiated Tumor of the Right Colon in a Patient With Ulcerative Colitis.Cureus · 2026Article
- Bibliometric analysis and knowledge mapping of thoracic SMARCA4-deficient undifferentiated tumor.Discover oncology · 2026Article
- SMARCA4-deficient thoracic tumor with vascular differentiation requiring superior vena cava reconstruction: a case report.Journal of cardiothoracic surgery · 2026Article
- The role of SMARCA4 in lung cancer.Scientific reports · 2025Review
- Treatment of Thoracic SMARCA4-Deficient Undifferentiated Tumors: Where We Are and Where We Will Go.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024Review
- Thoracic SMARCA4-deficient undifferentiated tumour: Diagnostic challenges and potential for misdiagnosis in small tissue samples.Respirology case reports · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
We report a diagnostically challenging case of a SMARCA4-deficient undifferentiated tumour to emphasize its potential to mimic other malignant tumours on histology, especially in small biopsies and where rhabdoid morphology is lacking. A 48-year-old man, who was known for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and polysubstance use, presented with dyspnoea and an anterior mediastinal mass that had grown rapidly over a seven-month period. The rapid growth and location in the anterior mediastinum raised clinical suspicion for lymphoma or a germ cell tumour. Microscopic examination of a transthoracic, ultrasound-guided, core needle biopsy revealed relatively uniform, malignant epithelioid cells with clear cytoplasm, but lacking any rhabdoid features. Tumour necrosis was prominent. The immunohistochemistry panel was negative for lymphoma markers, but positive for SALL4 (a marker typically associated with germ cell tumours), CD34, EMA, and HepPar1, while expression of SMARCA4 and claudin-4 was entirely lost. Only focal cytokeratin expression was demonstrated. SMARCB1 (INI1) expression was retained. The diagnosis of SMARCA4-DUT was made based on these findings. Unfortunately, the tumour was already at an advanced stage at diagnosis (stage IVA) and the patient had a poor performance status. He was treated with palliative radiotherapy with no significant improvement in performance status and passed away 3 months after diagnosis. The case highlights the importance of considering SMARCA4-DUT in the differential diagnosis of an undifferentiated, rapidly growing thoracic tumour and the potential for misdiagnosis on a small tissue sample, particularly as rhabdoid morphology may be absent.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.