ArticleHealth science reports2023
Polymerase chain reaction-positivity and predictors for SARS-CoV-2 infection among diagnosed cases' in North West Ethiopia.
Article in Health science reports, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.
- Polymerase chain reaction-positivity and predictors for SARS-CoV-2 infection among diagnosed cases' in North West Ethiopia.Health science reports · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The lack of sophisticated diagnosing equipment for polymerase chain reaction (PCR) during the incidence of variant types of COVID-19 underestimates the morbidity and mortality patterns of this pandemic. Thus, this study aimed to estimate seropositive and confirmatory predictors for COVID-19 suspected and tested cases through polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) in two diagnosing. Methods: Results: A total of 285 suspected cases have participated in this study. The overall mean (±SD) age of the participants was 37.5 (±18.5) years. The majority, 174 (61.1%) of the tested groups were symptomatic when diagnosed. The positivity of RT-PCR for suspected and COVID-19 diagnosed cases were confirmed in 62/285 (21.75%). In multivariable analysis, they were aged 26-50 years (adjusted odds ratio [AOR] = 4.2, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.5-10.75), had comorbidity (AOR = 5.8; 95% CI = 2.1-12.2), and cigarette smokers (AOR = 13.5; 95% CI = 5.3-36.6) were significantly associated with developing COVID-19 infection. Conclusion: More than two in every nine suspected cases were positive RT-PCR tests, and the infectivity of COVID-19 was significantly associated with age 25-50 years, comorbidities, and cigarette smoking. The deployment of high-quality diagnostic kits like RT-PCR is crucial for the early detection and risk stratification of suspected cases.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.