Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37900049›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in public health2023

Exploring the factors that contribute to the successful implementation of antimicrobial resistance interventions: a comparison of high-income and low-middle-income countries.

Tiscar Graells, Irene A Lambraki, Melanie Cousins, Anaïs Léger, Patrik J G Henriksson, Max Troell, Carolee A Carson, Elizabeth Jane Parmley, Shannon E Majowicz, Didier Wernli and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in public health, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Carbapenem-resistantPublic health in practice (Oxford, England) · 2026
    Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Tiscar GraellsGlobal Economic Dynamics and the Biosphere, Royal Swedish Academy of Sciences, Stockholm, Sweden.
Irene A LambrakiSchool of Public Health Sciences, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, ON, Canada.
Melanie CousinsSchool of Public Health Sciences, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, ON, Canada.
Anaïs LégerGlobal Studies Institute, University of Geneva, Genève, Switzerland.
Patrik J G HenrikssonStockholm Resilience Centre, Stockholm University, Stockholm, Sweden.
Max TroellBeijer Institute of Ecological Economics, Royal Swedish Academy of Sciences, Stockholm, Sweden.
Carolee A CarsonCentre for Foodborne, Environmental and Zoonotic Infectious Diseases; Public Health Agency of Canada, Guelph, ON, Canada.
Elizabeth Jane ParmleyDepartment of Population Medicine, Ontario Veterinary College, University of Guelph, Guelph, ON, Canada.
Shannon E MajowiczSchool of Public Health Sciences, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, ON, Canada.
Didier WernliGlobal Studies Institute, University of Geneva, Genève, Switzerland.
Peter Søgaard JørgensenGlobal Economic Dynamics and the Biosphere, Royal Swedish Academy of Sciences, Stockholm, Sweden.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Antimicrobial resistance (AMR) is a challenge to modern medicine. Interventions have been applied worldwide to tackle AMR, but these actions are often not reported to peers or published, leading to important knowledge gaps about what actions are being taken. Understanding factors that influence the implementation of AMR interventions and what factors are relevant in low-middle-income countries (LMICs) and high-income countries (HICs) were the key objectives of this exploratory study, with the aim to identifying which priorities these contexts need. Methods: A questionnaire was used to explore context, characteristics, and success factors or obstacles to intervention success based on participant input. The context was analyzed using the AMR-Intervene framework, and success factors and obstacles to intervention success were identified using thematic analysis. Results: Of the 77 interventions, 57 were implemented in HICs and 17 in LMICs. Interventions took place in the animal sector, followed by the human sector. Public organizations were mainly responsible for implementation and funding. Nine themes and 32 sub-themes emerged as important for intervention success. The themes most frequently reported were 'behavior', 'capacity and resources', 'planning', and 'information'. Five sub-themes were key in all contexts ('collaboration and coordination', 'implementation', 'assessment', 'governance', and 'awareness'), two were key in LMICs ('funding and finances' and 'surveillance, antimicrobial susceptibility testing and preventive screening'), and five were key in HICs ('mandatory', 'multiple profiles', 'personnel', 'management', and 'design'). Conclusion: LMIC sub-themes showed that funding and surveillance were still key issues for interventions, while important HIC sub-themes were more specific and detailed, including mandatory enforcement, multiple profiles, and personnel needed for good management and good design. While behavior is often underrated when implementing AMR interventions, capacity and resources are usually considered, and LMICs can benefit from sub-themes captured in HICs if tailored to their contexts. The factors identified can improve the design, planning, implementation, and evaluation of interventions.

Indexed as

Anti-Bacterial AgentsDeveloping CountriesAnimalsDrug Resistance, BacterialHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeHumansIncomeAnti-Bacterial Agentsantibiotic resistanceantimicrobial resistanceglobal healthhigh and low-middle-income countriesinterventionspublic healthresiliencesuccess factors

Identifiers

PMID37900049
PMCPMC10612146

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.