Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37900008›Full record

ArticleGlobal surgical education : journal of the Association for Surgical Education2023

Cognitive models for mentally visualizing a sharp instrument in a blind procedure.

Faith Mueller, Austin Bachar, Md A Arif, Gregory W King, Antonis P Stylianou, Gary Sutkin

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Global surgical education : journal of the Association for Surgical Education, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 39% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Faith MuellerZucker School of Medicine at Hofstra/Northwell, New York, NY, USA.
Austin BacharFemale Pelvic Medicine and Reconstructive Surgery, University of Missouri Kansas City School of Medicine, 2411 Holmes Street, Kansas City, MO 64108, USA.
Md A ArifSchool of Science & Engineering, University of Missouri Kansas City, Kansas City, MO, USA.
Gregory W KingSchool of Science & Engineering, University of Missouri Kansas City, Kansas City, MO, USA.
Antonis P StylianouSchool of Science & Engineering, University of Missouri Kansas City, Kansas City, MO, USA.
Gary SutkinFemale Pelvic Medicine and Reconstructive Surgery, University of Missouri Kansas City School of Medicine, 2411 Holmes Street, Kansas City, MO 64108, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-6336-5109
University of Missouri–Kansas City · USHofstra University · US

Funding

VIRTUAL PELVIC SURGERY SIMULATOR FOR THE PREVENTION OF SURGICAL ERRORSR21EB025272 · NIBIB · UNIVERSITY OF MISSOURI KANSAS CITY · PI SUTKIN, GARY · 2018 to 2020
$610k
NIBIB NIH HHS R21 EB025272
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: Our objective was to understand the cognitive strategies used by surgeons to mentally visualize navigation of a surgical instrument through blind space. Methods: We conducted semi-structured interviews with 15 expert and novice surgeons following simulated retropubic trocar passage on 3D-printed models of pelvises segmented from preop MRIs. Midurethral sling surgery involves blind passage of a trocar among the urethra, bladder, iliac vessels, and bowel while relying primarily on haptic feedback from the suprapubic bone (SPB) for guidance. Our conceptual foundation was based on Lahav's study on blind people's mental mapping of spaces using haptic cues. Participants detailed how they mentally pictured the trocar's location relative to vital anatomy. We coded all responses and used constant comparative analysis to generate themes, confirmed with member checking. Results: Expert and novice participants utilized multiple cognitive strategies combined with haptic feedback to accomplish safe trocar passage. Some used a step-by-step route strategy, visualizing sequential 2D axial images of anatomy adjacent to the SPB. Others used a map strategy, forming global 3D pictures. Although these mental pictures vanished when they were "lost," a safe zone could be reestablished by touching the SPB. Experts were more likely to relate their body position to the trocar path and rely on minor variations in resistance. Novices were more inclined toward backtracking of the trocar. Conclusions: Our findings may be extended to any blind surgical procedure. Teaching visualization strategies and incorporating tactile feedback can be used intraoperatively to help learners navigate their instrument safely around vital organs.

Indexed as

Cognitive strategiesMidurethral slingPatient safetyQualitative methodologySurgical educationSurgical simulation

Identifiers

PMID37900008
PMCPMC10604355
OpenAlexW4385768815

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.