Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37899949›Full record

ArticleClinical & translational immunology2023

Early CRP kinetics to predict long-term efficacy of first-line immune-checkpoint inhibition combination therapies in metastatic renal cell carcinoma: an updated multicentre real-world experience applying different CRP kinetics definitions.

Benedikt Hoeh, Cristina Cano Garcia, Severine Banek, Niklas Klümper, Alexander Cox, Jörg Ellinger, Philipp Schmucker, Oliver Hahn, Angelika Mattigk, Friedemann Zengerling and 7 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical & translational immunology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors at 8 institutions in 3 countries.

Benedikt HoehDepartment of Urology University Hospital Frankfurt, Goethe University Frankfurt am Main Frankfurt Germany.
Cristina Cano GarciaDepartment of Urology University Hospital Frankfurt, Goethe University Frankfurt am Main Frankfurt Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4829-0241
Severine BanekDepartment of Urology University Hospital Frankfurt, Goethe University Frankfurt am Main Frankfurt Germany.
Niklas KlümperDepartment of Urology University Hospital Bonn (UKB) Bonn Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3258-0586
Alexander CoxDepartment of Urology University Hospital Bonn (UKB) Bonn Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7837-5740
Jörg EllingerDepartment of Urology University Hospital Bonn (UKB) Bonn Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7526-0857
Philipp SchmuckerDepartment of Urology and Paediatric Urology Julius Maximilians University Medical Centre of Würzburg Würzburg Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3487-0560
Oliver HahnDepartment of Urology and Paediatric Urology Julius Maximilians University Medical Centre of Würzburg Würzburg Germany.
Angelika MattigkDepartment of Urology and Paediatric Urology University Hospital Ulm Ulm Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8710-458X
Friedemann ZengerlingDepartment of Urology and Paediatric Urology University Hospital Ulm Ulm Germany.
Philippe BeckerDepartment of Urology and Paediatric Urology Saarland University Homburg/Saar Germany.
Kati ErdmannDepartment of Urology, University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus Technische Universität Dresden Dresden Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3717-3637
Bjoern Thorben BuerkDepartment of Urology, University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus Technische Universität Dresden Dresden Germany.
Luka FlegarDepartment of Urology Philipps-University Marburg Marburg Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1477-9161
Johannes HuberDepartment of Urology Philipps-University Marburg Marburg Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7243-8958
Charis KalogirouDepartment of Urology and Paediatric Urology Julius Maximilians University Medical Centre of Würzburg Würzburg Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3802-940X
Philip ZeuschnerDepartment of Urology and Paediatric Urology Saarland University Homburg/Saar Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8898-6588
Goethe University Frankfurt · DEUniversity Hospital Bonn · DEUniversity of Würzburg · DEPhilipps University of Marburg · DEUniversity Hospital Carl Gustav Carus · DEUniversity Hospital Ulm · DESaarland University · DESUNY Geneseo · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objectives: Although biomarkers predicting therapy response in first-line metastatic renal carcinoma (mRCC) therapy remain to be defined, C-reactive protein (CRP) kinetics have recently been associated with immunotherapy (IO) response. Here, we aimed to assess the predictive and prognostic power of two contemporary CRP kinetics definitions in a large, real-world first-line mRCC cohort. Methods: Metastatic renal carcinoma patients treated with IO-based first-line therapy within 5 years were retrospectively included in this multicentre study. According to Fukuda Results: Out of 316 mRCC patients, 227 (72%) were assigned to CRP groups according to Fukuda. Both CRP flare- (HR [Hazard ratio]: 0.59) and CRP responders (HR: 0.52) had a longer PFS, but not OS, than non-CRP responders. According to Ishihara, 276 (87%) patients were assigned to the respective groups, and both normal and normalised patients had a significantly longer PFS and OS, compared with non-normalised group. Conclusion: Different early CRP kinetics may predict therapy response in first-line mRCC therapy in a large real-world cohort. However, further research regarding the optimal timing and frequency of measurement is needed.

Indexed as

biomarkercheckpoint inhibitionC‐reactive proteinCRP flare‐responsefirst‐line therapymetastatic renal cell carcinoma

Identifiers

PMID37899949
PMCPMC10600333
OpenAlexW4388034379

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.