ArticleLaryngoscope investigative otolaryngology2023
Gathering validity evidence for a 3D-printed simulator for training of myringotomy and ventilation tube insertion.
Article in Laryngoscope investigative otolaryngology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
- Addressing Cleft Care in Low- and Middle-Income Countries Beyond Cleft Lip and Palate with Improvement of Otolaryngology, Audiology, and Speech Services.The Cleft palate-craniofacial journal : official publication of the American Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Association · 2026Article
- Development and evaluation of a low-cost 3D-printed simulator for ossicular prosthesis placement.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Gathering validity evidence for a 3D-printed simulator for training of myringotomy and ventilation tube insertion.Laryngoscope investigative otolaryngology · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objectives: This study aimed to gather validity evidence according to Messick's framework for a novel 3D-printed simulator for myringotomy with ventilation tube insertion for use in technical skills training of otorhinolaryngology (ORL) residents. Methods: The study included 15 junior ORL residents (trainees) and 13 experienced teaching otolaryngologists (experts). Experts and trainees first received an identically structured introduction to the procedure, simulator, and simulation setup. Five procedures performed by each participant were video-recorded and ordered randomly for blinded rating by two independent raters. The rating tools used were a global rating scale (GBRS) and a task-specific checklist. Validity evidence was collected according to Messick's framework. Differences in time consumption and performance scores were analyzed. Finally, a pass/fail standard was established using the contrasting groups' method. Results: Trainees used significantly more time per procedure (109 s, 95% CI: 99-120) than experts (82 s, 95% CI: 71-93; Conclusion: We established educational validity evidence for a novel 3D-printed model for simulation-based training of ventilation tube insertion and established a reliable pass/fail standard. Level of Evidence: 1b.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.