Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37899846›Full record

ReviewLaryngoscope investigative otolaryngology2023

Risk factors and management strategies of inadvertent facial nerve stimulation in cochlear implant recipients: A systematic review.

Asma Alahmadi, Yassin Abdelsamad, Medhat Yousef, Salman F Alhabib, Afrah Alshalan, Nezar Hamed, Farid Alzhrani

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Laryngoscope investigative otolaryngology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Complications in 2000 adult and paediatric cochlear implants: what to expect and when.Acta otorhinolaryngologica Italica : organo ufficiale della Societa italiana di otorinolaringologia e chirurgia cervico-facciale · 2025
    Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Asma AlahmadiKing Abdullah Ear Specialist Center (KAESC), College of Medicine King Saud University Medical City (KSUMC), King Saud University Riyadh Saudi Arabia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6603-1596
Yassin AbdelsamadResearch Department MED-EL GmbH Riyadh Saudi Arabia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8281-5825
Medhat YousefKing Abdullah Ear Specialist Center (KAESC), College of Medicine King Saud University Medical City (KSUMC), King Saud University Riyadh Saudi Arabia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2102-6704
Salman F AlhabibKing Abdullah Ear Specialist Center (KAESC), College of Medicine King Saud University Medical City (KSUMC), King Saud University Riyadh Saudi Arabia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2646-0393
Afrah AlshalanDepartment of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery College of Medicine, Jouf University Sakaka Saudi Arabia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0265-6049
Nezar HamedKing Abdullah Ear Specialist Center (KAESC), College of Medicine King Saud University Medical City (KSUMC), King Saud University Riyadh Saudi Arabia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8622-6195
Farid AlzhraniKing Abdullah Ear Specialist Center (KAESC), College of Medicine King Saud University Medical City (KSUMC), King Saud University Riyadh Saudi Arabia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0564-7204
King Saud Medical City · SAJouf University · SARiyadh Elm University · SA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objectives: To systematically review the prevalence and risk factors of inadvertent facial nerve stimulation (FNS) after cochlear implant (CI) surgery. And to report the different management strategies used for reducing and resolving FNS. Data Source: Web of Science, Scopus, PubMed, Cochrane Library, and Virtual Health Library (VHL) of the World Health Organization (WHO). Review Methods: A systematic review was conducted according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) on studies that reported FNS as a complication after CI. A comprehensive electronic search strategy was used to identify the relevant articles. We extracted the data on the prevalence of FNS after CI activation, the reported grades, and the management strategies. The number of associated electrodes; cause of deafness; co-anomalies; and duration of hearing loss and their relationships with FNS were also studied. Results: Twenty-one relevant articles were included in this review. The prevalence of FNS among the CI populations was 5.29% (175/3306 patients). Among those whose ages were reported, 58.3% (95/163) were adults, and 41.7% (68/163) were pediatrics. Modifying the different fitting parameters was the most used strategy, as it successfully resolved FNS in 85.5% of the patients (142/166). The second commonly used management strategy was surgical intervention (reimplantation or explantation), which was reported in seven studies for 23 patients. Conclusion: FNS after CI activation could be controlled and resolved with many advances that range from readjusting the fitting parameters to surgical intervention. However, further studies are required to validate the efficacy of each management strategy and its impact on patients' performance. Our findings demonstrate that CI recipients with FNS could still benefit from the CI devices and their FNS could be controlled.

Indexed as

Cochlear implantdiagnosisfacial nerve stimulationmanagementrisk factors

Identifiers

PMID37899846
PMCPMC10601549
OpenAlexW4386650387

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.