Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37899817›Full record

ArticleSisli Etfal Hastanesi tip bulteni2023

Candidal Infections in the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit: A Retrospective Observational Study.

Gaffari Tunc, Arife Toksoz, Fatih Kilicbay

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Sisli Etfal Hastanesi tip bulteni, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 27% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. The accuracy of the Candida ScoreAnnals of medicine · 2025
    Article
  3. Neonatal Sepsis: A Comprehensive Review.Antibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Gaffari TuncDepartment of Pediatrics, Division of Neonatology, Bursa Yuksek Ihtisas Training and Research Hospital, Bursa, Türkiye.
Arife ToksozDepartment of Pediatrics, Hatay State Hospital, Hatay, Türkiye.
Fatih KilicbayDepartment of Pediatrics, Division of Neonatology, Sivas Cumhuriyet University Faculty of Medicine, Sivas, Türkiye.
Bursa Yuksek Ihtisas Egitim Ve Arastirma Hastanesi · TR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objectives: The aims of this study were to evaluate the demographic characteristics, risk factors, mortality rates, and laboratory findings of infants with fungal sepsis in the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit (NICU). Methods: This retrospective multicenter study included patients in NICU with Results: Candida infection was detected in blood cultures in 57 of 3450 patients admitted to the NICU. A total of 57 infants included in the study. Candida infection was determined 1.6% of infants in the study population, and 57% of them were extremely pre-term infants. There was no significant difference between the two groups in terms of laboratory data. Normal vaginal birth was determined at a higher rate in Group 1. In Group 2, length of hospital stay, duration of total parenteral nutrition (TPN), and mechanical ventilation (MV) were determined to be longer. The mortality due to Candida fungemia was determined as 35%, and of these patients, 65% had an additional medical condition. Conclusion: In accordance with the literature, this study showed that prolonged MV and longer TPN increased the incidence of fungal sepsis. Therefore, to decrease the fungal sepsis rate of NICU, shortening the hospital stay and effective screening programs are recommended.

Indexed as

Candida sppcandidemiafungal sepsisneonatal intensive care unitnosocomial infection

Identifiers

PMID37899817
PMCPMC10600624
OpenAlexW4321122167

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.