Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37899806›Full record

ReviewSisli Etfal Hastanesi tip bulteni2023

State-of-the-art Prostate Imaging.

Hakan Ayyildiz, Artur Salmaslioglu, Atadan Tunaci, Sukru Mehmet Erturk

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Sisli Etfal Hastanesi tip bulteni, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Hakan AyyildizDepartment of Radiology, Istanbul University, Istanbul Faculty of Medicine, Istanbul, Türkiye.
Artur SalmasliogluDepartment of Radiology, Istanbul University, Istanbul Faculty of Medicine, Istanbul, Türkiye.
Atadan TunaciDepartment of Radiology, Istanbul University, Istanbul Faculty of Medicine, Istanbul, Türkiye.
Sukru Mehmet ErturkDepartment of Radiology, Istanbul University, Istanbul Faculty of Medicine, Istanbul, Türkiye.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Prostate cancer is one of the most common cancers in men. In addition to methods such as prostate-specific antigen test, digital rectal examination, and transrectal ultrasonography, magnetic resonance imaging has an important role for accurate and reproducible diagnosis. However, guidance in targeted biopsies and recent use in determining localization for treatment increase its importance. Due to technical difficulties, patient tolerance, and differences in interpretation, the prostate imaging reporting and data system recommends preparations for the patient and magnetic resonance imaging techniques. However, techniques continue to be developed to improve the diagnosis rate and image quality. In our article, patient preparation before imaging and techniques were tried to be discussed in detail. In addition, current approaches in biparametric magnetic resonance imaging and radiomics and new techniques such as T1 and T2 mapping will be mentioned.

Indexed as

Magnetic resonance imagingmultiparametric magnetic resonance imagingprostate cancer

Identifiers

PMID37899806
PMCPMC10600631

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.