ArticleResearch (Washington, D.C.)2023
3D-Printed Flat-Bone-Mimetic Bioceramic Scaffolds for Cranial Restoration.
Article in Research (Washington, D.C.), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
23 citing papers in PubMed, 35 citations in OpenAlex.
- Epigenetic reprogramming periosteum promotes aging critical segmental bone defect repair via methylation remodeling.Bioactive materials · 2026Article
- Three-Dimensional Printing and Personalized Bioceramic Scaffolds for Dental and Maxillofacial Applications: A Narrative Review.Dentistry journal · 2026Review
- Engineering a vascularized-osteogenic microenvironment to enhance bone regeneration via a 3D-printed composite scaffold with progressive-release bio-factors.Journal of translational medicine · 2026Article
- Review
- Black phosphorus-based photothermal-responsive hydrogel enhanced osteoporotic bone injury regeneration by alleviating oxidative stress and remodeling bone homeostasis.Journal of nanobiotechnology · 2026Article
- 4D-printed Fe3O4-PLLA scaffolds modulate osteoimmune microenvironment for oral bone repair.Materials today. Bio · 2026Article
- Article
- Trabecular-Like Scaffold Dictates Osteogenesis via Fluid Shear Stress-Induced Metabolic Reprogramming through the CAV1-HIF-1α Axis.Research (Washington, D.C.) · 2026Article
- Stromal Vascular Fraction Gel for Osteoarthritis: Mechanisms and Therapeutic Benefits.Stem cells international · 2026Review
- 3D-printed nHA/PA66 porous scaffold: Regulating immune balance and vascularization synergistically promotes bone regeneration.Materials today. Bio · 2025Article
- Topography-based implants for bone regeneration: Design, biological mechanism, and therapeutics.Materials today. Bio · 2025Review
- Wet-adhesive and antibacterial PAH-TPP coacervates with self-mineralizing capability for cranial flap fixation.Bioactive materials · 2025Article
- Fast shape memory function and personalized PLTMC/SIM/MBG composite scaffold for bone regeneration.Materials today. Bio · 2025Article
- 3D-printed gallium-infused scaffolds for osteolysis intervention and bone regeneration.Materials today. Bio · 2025Article
- Article
- An insightful overview on osteogenic potential of nano hydroxyapatite for bone regeneration.Cell and tissue banking · 2025Review
- Anti-inflammatory coupled anti-angiogenic airway stent effectively suppresses tracheal in-stents restenosis.Journal of nanobiotechnology · 2025Article
- Dual-Function Biomaterials for Postoperative Osteosarcoma: Tumor Suppression and Bone Regeneration.Research (Washington, D.C.) · 2025Review
- Enhancing Bone Repair with β-TCP-Based Composite Scaffolds: A Review of Design Strategies and Biological Mechanisms.Orthopedic research and reviews · 2025Review
- Three-dimensional-printed triply periodic minimal surface scaffolds via digital light processing for enhanced osteogenesis.Regenerative biomaterials · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The limitations of autologous bone grafts necessitate the development of advanced biomimetic biomaterials for efficient cranial defect restoration. The cranial bones are typical flat bones with sandwich structures, consisting of a diploe in the middle region and 2 outer compact tables. In this study, we originally developed 2 types of flat-bone-mimetic β-tricalcium phosphate bioceramic scaffolds (Gyr-Comp and Gyr-Tub) by high-precision vat-photopolymerization-based 3-dimensional printing. Both scaffolds had 2 outer layers and an inner layer with gyroid pores mimicking the diploe structure. The outer layers of Gyr-Comp scaffolds simulated the low porosity of outer tables, while those of Gyr-Tub scaffolds mimicked the tubular pore structure in the tables of flat bones. The Gyr-Comp and Gyr-Tub scaffolds possessed higher compressive strength and noticeably promoted in vitro cell proliferation, osteogenic differentiation, and angiogenic activities compared with conventional scaffolds with cross-hatch structures. After implantation into rabbit cranial defects for 12 weeks, Gyr-Tub achieved the best repairing effects by accelerating the generation of bone tissues and blood vessels. This work provides an advanced strategy to prepare biomimetic biomaterials that fit the structural and functional needs of efficacious bone regeneration.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.