Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37899770›Full record

ArticleGlobal qualitative nursing research

Mental Health Nurses' Social Representations of People Who Experience Mental Illness: A Story of Paradoxes.

Delphine Kallai, Virginie März, Philippe de Timary, Jan De Mol

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Global qualitative nursing research. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Delphine KallaiUCLouvain, Louvain-la-Neuve, Walloon Brabant, Belgium.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3180-6579
Virginie MärzUCLouvain, Louvain-la-Neuve, Walloon Brabant, Belgium.
Philippe de TimaryUCLouvain, Louvain-la-Neuve, Walloon Brabant, Belgium.
Jan De MolUCLouvain, Louvain-la-Neuve, Walloon Brabant, Belgium.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Public representations of people who experience mental illness (PEMI) have been well documented within the stigma literature. However, studies about mental health nurses' representations of PEMI are still scarce and characterized by contradictions. Using the theoretical concept of social representation instead of stigma, the current study aims to explore and understand mental health nurses' social representations of PEMI. Qualitative research was conducted based on 13 semi-structured interviews with nurses from two psychiatric units in general hospitals. Data were analyzed using interpretative phenomenological analysis. Results showed that nurses' social representations were characterized by paradoxes. They explicitly displayed positive social representations, while nuancing them from an implicit point of view. The nurses wanted to work toward a destigmatizing voice for PEMI while nuancing their assertions to sound honest and accurate, which led them to a state of cognitive dissonance.

Indexed as

Belgiumcognitive dissonanceinterpretative phenomenological analysismental health nursesmental illnesspsychiatrysocial representations

Identifiers

PMID37899770
PMCPMC10605669

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.