Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37899502›Full record

ArticleJournal of chemical information and modeling2023

Distribution of Bound Conformations in Conformational Ensembles for X-ray Ligands Predicted by the ANI-2X Machine Learning Potential.

Fengyang Han, Dongxiao Hao, Xibing He, Luxuan Wang, Taoyu Niu, Junmei Wang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of chemical information and modeling, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Fengyang HanDepartment of Pharmaceutical Sciences and Computational Chemical Genomics Screening Center, School of Pharmacy, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15261, United States.
Dongxiao HaoSchool of Electronics and Information Engineering, Ankang University, Ankang 725000, China.
Xibing HeDepartment of Pharmaceutical Sciences and Computational Chemical Genomics Screening Center, School of Pharmacy, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15261, United States.ORCID 0000-0001-7431-7893
Luxuan WangDepartment of Pharmaceutical Sciences and Computational Chemical Genomics Screening Center, School of Pharmacy, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15261, United States.
Taoyu NiuDepartment of Pharmaceutical Sciences and Computational Chemical Genomics Screening Center, School of Pharmacy, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15261, United States.
Junmei WangDepartment of Pharmaceutical Sciences and Computational Chemical Genomics Screening Center, School of Pharmacy, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15261, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-9607-8229

Funding

New Generation of General AMBER Force Field for Biomedical ResearchR01GM147673 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI WANG, JUNMEI, YANG, WEI · 2022 to 2025
$1.5M
AI-Powered Biased Ligand DesignR01GM149705 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI Junmei Wang · 2023 to 2026
$1.3M
NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM147673NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM149705
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In this study, we systematically studied the energy distribution of bioactive conformations of small molecular ligands in their conformational ensembles using ANI-2X, a machine learning potential, in conjunction with one of our recently developed geometry optimization algorithms, known as a conjugate gradient with backtracking line search (CG-BS). We first evaluated the combination of these methods (ANI-2X/CG-BS) using two molecule sets. For the 231-molecule set, ab initio calculations were performed at both the ωB97X/6-31G(d) and B3LYP-D3BJ/DZVP levels for accuracy comparison, while for the 8,992-molecule set, ab initio calculations were carried out at the B3LYP-D3BJ/DZVP level. For each molecule in the two molecular sets, up to 10 conformations were generated, which diminish the influence of individual outliers on the performance evaluation. Encouraged by the performance of ANI-2x/CG-BS in these evaluations, we calculated the energy distributions using ANI-2x/CG-BS for more than 27,000 ligands in the protein data bank (PDB). Each ligand has at least one conformation bound to a biological molecule, and this ligand conformation is labeled as a bound conformation. Besides the bound conformations, up to 200 conformations were generated using OpenEye's Omega2 software (https://docs.eyesopen.com/applications/ omega/) for each conformation. We performed a statistical analysis of how the bound conformation energies are distributed in the ensembles for 17,197 PDB ligands that have their bound conformation energies within the energy ranges of the Omega2-generated conformation ensembles. We found that half of the ligands have their relative conformation energy lower than 2.91 kcal/mol for the bound conformations in comparison with the global conformations, and about 90% of the bound conformations are within 10 kcal/mol above the global conformation energies. This information is useful to guide the construction of libraries for shape-based virtual screening and to improve the docking algorithm to efficiently sample bound conformations.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsSoftwareLigandsMolecular ConformationX-RaysLigands

Identifiers

PMID37899502
PMCPMC10647024

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.