Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37899414›Full record

ArticleAnnals of surgical oncology2024

The Short- and Long-Term Surgical Results of Consecutive Hepatopancreaticoduodenectomy for Wide-Spread Biliary Malignancy.

Yasunori Yoshimi, Takehiro Noji, Keisuke Okamura, Kimitaka Tanaka, Aya Matsui, Yoshitsugu Nakanishi, Toshimichi Asano, Toru Nakamura, Takahiro Tsuchikawa, Yasuyuki Kawamoto and 4 more

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of surgical oncology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Observational
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Present and future of liver transplantation for cholangiocellular carcinoma: moving toward personalized multiparametric transplantability patterns.Transplant international : official journal of the European Society for Organ Transplantation · 2026
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Yasunori YoshimiDepartment of Gastroenterological Surgery II, Faculty of Medicine, Hokkaido University, Sapporo, Japan.
Takehiro NojiDepartment of Gastroenterological Surgery II, Faculty of Medicine, Hokkaido University, Sapporo, Japan. dnoji@med.hokudai.ac.jp.
Keisuke OkamuraDepartment of Gastroenterological Surgery II, Faculty of Medicine, Hokkaido University, Sapporo, Japan.
Kimitaka TanakaDepartment of Gastroenterological Surgery II, Faculty of Medicine, Hokkaido University, Sapporo, Japan.
Aya MatsuiDepartment of Gastroenterological Surgery II, Faculty of Medicine, Hokkaido University, Sapporo, Japan.
Yoshitsugu NakanishiDepartment of Gastroenterological Surgery II, Faculty of Medicine, Hokkaido University, Sapporo, Japan.
Toshimichi AsanoDepartment of Gastroenterological Surgery II, Faculty of Medicine, Hokkaido University, Sapporo, Japan.
Toru NakamuraDepartment of Gastroenterological Surgery II, Faculty of Medicine, Hokkaido University, Sapporo, Japan.
Takahiro TsuchikawaDepartment of Gastroenterological Surgery II, Faculty of Medicine, Hokkaido University, Sapporo, Japan.
Yasuyuki KawamotoDepartment of Gastroenterology, Faculty of Medicine, Hokkaido University, Sapporo, Japan.
Kazuaki HaradaDepartment of Gastroenterology, Faculty of Medicine, Hokkaido University, Sapporo, Japan.
Kanako FuyamaDepartment of Biostatistics, Faculty of Medicine, Hokkaido University, Sapporo, Japan.
Kazuhumi OkadaDepartment of Biostatistics, Faculty of Medicine, Hokkaido University, Sapporo, Japan.
Satoshi HiranoDepartment of Gastroenterological Surgery II, Faculty of Medicine, Hokkaido University, Sapporo, Japan.
Hokkaido University · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCancer-free resection (R0) is one of the most important factors for the long-term survival of biliary carcinoma. For some patients with widespread invasive cancer located between the hilar and intrapancreatic bile duct, hepatopancreaticoduodenectomy (HPD) is considered a radical surgery for R0 resection. However, HPD is associated with high morbidity and mortality rates. Furthermore, previous reports have not shown lymph node metastasis (LNM) status, such as the location or number, which could influence the prognosis after HPD. In this study, first, we explored the prognostic factors for survival, and second, we evaluated whether the LNM status (number and location of LNM) would influence the decision on surgical indications in patients with widely spread biliary malignancy.

methodsWe retrospectively reviewed the medical records of 54 patients who underwent HPD with hepatectomy in ≥2 liver sectors from January 2003 to December 2021 (HPD-G). We also evaluated 54 unresectable perihilar cholangiocarcinoma patients who underwent chemotherapy from January 2010 to December 2021 (CTx-G).

resultsR0 resection was performed in 48 patients (89%). The median survival time (MST) and 5-year overall survival rate of the HPD-G and CTx-G groups were 36.9 months and 31.1%, and 19.6 months and 0%, respectively. Univariate and multivariate analyses showed that pathological portal vein involvement was an independent prognostic factor for survival (MST: 18.9 months). Additionally, patients with peripancreatic LNM had worse prognoses (MST: 13.3 months) than CTx-G.

conclusionsPatients with peripancreatic LNM or PV invasion might be advised to be excluded from surgery-first indications for HPD.

Indexed as

Bile Duct NeoplasmsBiliary Tract NeoplasmsCholangiocarcinomaBile Ducts, IntrahepaticHepatectomyHumansLymphatic MetastasisPrognosisRetrospective StudiesHepatopancreaticoduodenectomyLymph node metastasisPortal vein resectionPrognosisSurgical indication

Identifiers

PMID37899414
OpenAlexW4388014840

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.